From razor-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Thu Oct 3 12:25:24 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0B316F6B for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:24:42 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 03 Oct 2002 12:24:42 +0100 (IST) Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9390KK21932 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:00:21 +0100 Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13] helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17x1p5-0002DL-00; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 01:59:07 -0700 Received: from adsl-67-116-63-16.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net ([67.116.63.16] helo=rover.vipul.net) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17x1oj-0007ib-00 for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 01:58:45 -0700 Received: (from vipul@localhost) by rover.vipul.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g938wfJ04095 for razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 01:58:41 -0700 From: Vipul Ved Prakash To: razor-users@example.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Razor-users] Fire.cloudmark.com is having issues Message-Id: <20021003015841.C3645@rover.vipul.net> Mail-Followup-To: razor-users@example.sourceforge.net References: <20021003052049.GA2299@darkridge.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20021003052049.GA2299@darkridge.com>; from jpr5@darkridge.com on Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 10:20:49PM -0700 X-Operating-System: Linux rover.vipul.net 2.4.19 X-Privacy: If possible, encrypt your reply. Key at http://vipul.net/ Sender: razor-users-admin@example.sourceforge.net Errors-To: razor-users-admin@example.sourceforge.net X-Beenthere: razor-users@example.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Original-Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 01:58:41 -0700 Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 01:58:41 -0700 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FORGED_RCVD_TRAIL,IN_REP_TO, KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: If you examine the log further, you'll see debug messages generated by the (content) reporting process that follows error 230. On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 10:20:49PM -0700, Jordan Ritter wrote: > Error 230 occurs when you report a signature, but the server doesn't > know about the signature, so it wants the full content. It's > basically an optimization. > > Beyond that, I'm not sure how to interpret that output.. what version? > Vipul? > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:59:01PM -0400, Rose, Bobby wrote: > # What does this mean? I set up procmailrc for a spamtrap but I'm getting > # an error. I also am reporting to pyzor and dcc and they aren't > # registering an error. What's weird is that it works sometimes. > # > # . > # Oct 02 23:46:11.470523 report[14051]: [ 4] honor.cloudmark.com >> 20 > # Oct 02 23:46:11.470805 report[14051]: [ 6] response to sent.3 > # -res=1 > # err=230 > # . > # Oct 02 23:46:11.471825 report[14051]: [ 5] mail 1, orig_email, special > # case eng 1: Server accept > # ed report. > # Oct 02 23:46:11.472228 report[14051]: [ 8] mail 1.0, eng 4: err 230 - > # server wants mail -- Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not Software Design Artist | widely distributed yet." http://vipul.net/ | -- William Gibson ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users