From quinlan@pathname.com Mon Sep 16 10:41:51 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9220716F03 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 10:41:50 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 16 Sep 2002 10:41:50 +0100 (IST) Received: from proton.pathname.com (adsl-216-103-211-240.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.103.211.240]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8G4tNC13670 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 05:55:23 +0100 Received: from quinlan by proton.pathname.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17qnvH-0004Rr-00; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 21:55:47 -0700 From: Daniel Quinlan MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <15749.25683.361874.673913@proton.pathname.com> Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 21:55:47 -0700 To: yyyy@example.com (Justin Mason) Cc: Daniel Quinlan , Matt Sergeant , Spamassassin-devel Subject: Re: [SAdev] testing with less rules In-Reply-To: <20020915233332.82A4E16F03@example.com> References: <20020915233332.82A4E16F03@jmason.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.04 under Emacs 20.7.2 Reply-To: quinlan@pathname.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: Justin Mason writes: > hmm. also I think I've found some cases where it's hitting on fetchmail > Received hdrs. that's bad. so it could be fixed.... fetchmail adds Received headers? That seems wrong. I'll open a bug to investigate. Can you attach some examples? > yeah, will do -- somehow. pity the bugzilla doesn't allow email > submissions... Agreed. At least you can add information with email. - Dan