From spamassassin-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Mon Sep 16 00:10:47 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C2C16F03 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 00:10:47 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 16 Sep 2002 00:10:47 +0100 (IST) Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8FKfDC27929 for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 21:41:13 +0100 Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13] helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17qgBZ-0006Tv-00; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 13:40:05 -0700 Received: from www.ctyme.com ([209.237.228.10] helo=darwin.ctyme.com) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17qgBK-0003IH-00 for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 13:39:50 -0700 Received: from m206-56.dsl.tsoft.com ([198.144.206.56] helo=perkel.com) by darwin.ctyme.com with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 17qgB6-0002Od-00; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 13:39:36 -0700 Message-Id: <3D84F004.7000805@perkel.com> From: Marc Perkel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020513 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Tony L. Svanstrom" Cc: spamassassin-devel@example.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [SAdev] Suggestion - 2 levels of Spam Status References: <20020915223031.O43994-100000@moon.campus.luth.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: spamassassin-devel-admin@example.sourceforge.net Errors-To: spamassassin-devel-admin@example.sourceforge.net X-Beenthere: spamassassin-devel@example.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: SpamAssassin Developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Original-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 13:39:32 -0700 Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 13:39:32 -0700 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=7.0 tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA, X_ACCEPT_LANG version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: Tony L. Svanstrom wrote: >On Sun, 15 Sep 2002 the voices made Marc Perkel write: > >>Right now we have one spam status flag indicating that a message is or >>is not spam. The idea being that the end user perhaps make a rule that >>would move the spam flagged messages into a spam folder and thus gain >>some time by presorting messages into to piles. >> > > If you (people) don't know enough to filter on the actual score they've got >the "stars", which will give them more than enough levers, if they want it. > > > /Tony > Sure - we developers know that - but what I'm talking about is making it easier for END USERS to figure out. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-devel mailing list Spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel