From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Wed Sep 11 21:52:21 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5787F16F03 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 21:52:21 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 11 Sep 2002 21:52:21 +0100 (IST) Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8BKfNC31298 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 21:41:23 +0100 Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13] helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17pEGQ-0003qY-00; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:39:06 -0700 Received: from relay07.indigo.ie ([194.125.133.231]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17pEGA-0006VF-00 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:38:50 -0700 Received: (qmail 12218 messnum 1023198 invoked from network[194.125.172.225/ts12-225.dublin.indigo.ie]); 11 Sep 2002 20:38:46 -0000 Received: from ts12-225.dublin.indigo.ie (HELO example.com) (194.125.172.225) by relay07.indigo.ie (qp 12218) with SMTP; 11 Sep 2002 20:38:46 -0000 Received: by example.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 662ED16F03; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 21:38:45 +0100 (IST) Received: from example.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63077F7B1; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 21:38:45 +0100 (IST) To: Robert Strickler Cc: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Yeah right... If spamassassin was looking through th is mail, it would have marked it as spam. In-Reply-To: Message from Robert Strickler of "Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:10:49 CDT." <0FCA00EE04CDD3119C910050041FBA703A67F3@ilpostoffice.main.net56.net> From: yyyy@example.com (Justin Mason) X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: 0A48 2D8B 0B52 A87D 0E8A 6ADD 4137 1B50 6E58 EF0A X-Habeas-Swe-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-Swe-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-Swe-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-Swe-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-Swe-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-Swe-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-Swe-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-Swe-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-Swe-9: mark in spam to . Message-Id: <20020911203845.662ED16F03@example.com> Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Original-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 21:38:40 +0100 Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 21:38:40 +0100 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL,HABEAS_SWE,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: Robert Strickler said: > Looks like we need an identity stamp in the X-Spam headers so that SA only > accepts headers from authorized sources. Well, SpamAssassin will just ignore any old X-Spam-whatever headers it finds, so that cannot be used to get around the filter. --j. ------------------------------------------------------- In remembrance www.osdn.com/911/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk