From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Thu Aug 29 13:42:18 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83CE44155 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 08:42:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:42:17 +0100 (IST) Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7TCd6Z12467 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:39:06 +0100 Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13] helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17kOYo-0005wJ-00; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 05:38:06 -0700 Received: from panoramix.vasoftware.com ([198.186.202.147]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17kOYE-0006nt-00 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 05:37:30 -0700 Received: from hippo.star.co.uk ([195.216.14.9]:4234) by panoramix.vasoftware.com with smtp (Exim 4.05-VA-mm1 #1 (Debian)) id 17kOY9-0005jU-00 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 05:37:25 -0700 Received: from MATT_LINUX by hippo.star.co.uk via smtpd (for panoramix.vasoftware.com [198.186.202.147]) with SMTP; 29 Aug 2002 12:28:25 UT Received: (qmail 18838 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2002 12:33:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO startechgroup.co.uk) (10.2.100.178) by matt?dev.int.star.co.uk with SMTP; 27 Aug 2002 12:33:08 -0000 Message-Id: <3D6E14B1.50800@startechgroup.co.uk> From: Matt Sergeant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020426 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Urban Boquist Cc: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net References: <15726.1821.102072.86673@iller.crt.se> <3D6E0984.5030708@startechgroup.co.uk> <15726.5113.595562.513688@iller.crt.se> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SA very slow (hangs?) on this message, or is it just me? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Original-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:33:53 +0100 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:33:53 +0100 X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times. X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.5 required=7.0 tests=KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_03_05,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA, X_ACCEPT_LANG version=2.40-cvs X-Spam-Level: Urban Boquist wrote: > Hi Matt, and thanks for your quick reply. > > Matt> Don't run SA on mails this large. > > That would be fine, if I only understood how I should do that. I can't > find anything in the SA documention that mentions some kind of upper > limit for the size of a message. What should I put in my user_prefs > file? > > I run SA from procmail btw, but I can't imagine that procmail would be > able to check the size of a message before handing it over to SA? That's exactly what it can do: :0fw <250000 | spamassassin -P ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk