From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Thu Aug 29 11:06:49 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D4344175 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 06:05:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:05:19 +0100 (IST) Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7SMPTZ12720 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 23:25:29 +0100 Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13] helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17kBEK-0003ev-00; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 15:24:04 -0700 Received: from adsl-216-103-211-240.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([216.103.211.240] helo=proton.pathname.com) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17kBE4-0001J7-00 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 15:23:48 -0700 Received: from quinlan by proton.pathname.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17kBE1-00088a-00; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 15:23:45 -0700 To: Arnaud Abelard Cc: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [SAtalk] custom score for a given domain? References: <3D6CE817.20608@sciences.univ-nantes.fr> From: Daniel Quinlan In-Reply-To: Arnaud Abelard's message of "Wed, 28 Aug 2002 17:11:19 +0200" Message-Id: Lines: 20 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Original-Date: 28 Aug 2002 15:23:45 -0700 Date: 28 Aug 2002 15:23:45 -0700 X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times. X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=7.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT_GNUS_XM version=2.40-cvs X-Spam-Level: > MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA (4.0 points) > INVALID_MSGID (1.8 points) > MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_2 (1.6 points) Here are the new scores in the 2.40 branch (they may change, but they are better than before). score INVALID_MSGID 1.226 score MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA 1.696 score MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_2 0.532 Total of 3.5 which is better than 7.4, I suppose. If they fixed their MSGID, it would help. I suppose we could allow comments without hurting spam detection too much, but I'm reluctant (it's pretty bizarre to put a comment after the Message-ID header). Can you open a bugzilla ticket for this one? Dan ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk