From quinlan@pathname.com Wed Aug 28 10:45:34 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F6F4415B for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 05:44:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:44:48 +0100 (IST) Received: from proton.pathname.com (adsl-216-103-211-240.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.103.211.240]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7RLjPZ27063 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 22:45:25 +0100 Received: from quinlan by proton.pathname.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17jo9X-00072t-00; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 14:45:35 -0700 To: yyyy@example.com (Justin Mason) Cc: Matt Sergeant , spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [SAdev] SpamAssassin POP3 proxy References: <20020827121720.1A37C43F99@phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com> From: Daniel Quinlan Date: 27 Aug 2002 14:45:35 -0700 In-Reply-To: yyyy@example.com's message of "Tue, 27 Aug 2002 13:17:15 +0100" Message-Id: Lines: 15 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times. X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=7.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.40-cvs X-Spam-Level: jm@jmason.org (Justin Mason) writes: > Actually, I want to avoid that -- I've already removed spamproxyd > from the distro for 2.40. Here's why: > > When they're in the distro, *we* have to support them -- which is > not necessarily a good thing when we didn't write them in the first > place, or when the coder in question may not *want* us to maintain > them. :( I would be in favor of creating new SpamAssassin CVS modules and Bugzilla categories for other clients (provided there is sufficient interest and a maintainer). Dan