From rpm-list-admin@freshrpms.net Sat Oct 5 17:21:50 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8425216F03 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 17:21:49 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Sat, 05 Oct 2002 17:21:49 +0100 (IST) Received: from egwn.net (ns2.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g95DOfK10926 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 14:24:42 +0100 Received: from auth02.nl.egwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g95DE2f01952; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:14:02 +0200 Received: from bennew01.localdomain (pD900DDC6.dip.t-dialin.net [217.0.221.198]) by egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g95DD2f29025 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:13:02 +0200 Received: from bennew01.localdomain (bennew01.localdomain [192.168.3.1]) by bennew01.localdomain (8.12.5/linuxconf) with SMTP id g95DCmUv028047 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:12:49 +0200 From: Matthias Haase To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net Subject: Re: RedHat 8.0 and his own freetype Message-Id: <20021005151248.2184c904.matthias_haase@bennewitz.com> In-Reply-To: <3D9E1F20.3050300@eecs.berkeley.edu> References: <20021004155451.52f9ecd5.matthias_haase@bennewitz.com> <3D9E1F20.3050300@eecs.berkeley.edu> X-Operating-System: customized linux smp kernel 2.4* on i686 X-Mailer: Sylpheed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailscanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Sender: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net Errors-To: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net X-Beenthere: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Freshrpms RPM discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Original-Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:12:48 +0200 Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:12:48 +0200 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, T_NONSENSE_FROM_40_50 version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: On Fri, 04 Oct 2002 16:07:12 -0700 Ben Liblit wrote: > So if your fonts look ugly, lack of bytecode hinting is *not* the cause. Well you are right, sorry, I didn't have any better idea yesterday late in the evening. The fonts are ugly only inside of gnome2 and clean for gnome1 apps, if antialiasing is disabled. This is difficult to understand for me. -- regards from Germany Matthias _______________________________________________ RPM-List mailing list http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list