From rpm-list-admin@freshrpms.net Mon Sep 23 22:46:13 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8151516F17 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 22:46:12 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 23 Sep 2002 22:46:12 +0100 (IST) Received: from egwn.net (ns2.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8NHvrC28415 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:57:53 +0100 Received: from auth02.nl.egwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g8NHk2f18832; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 19:46:02 +0200 Received: from interlize.com.br (interlize.com.br [200.244.92.2] (may be forged)) by egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g8NHibf12369 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 19:44:38 +0200 Received: from [10.0.0.3] [200.173.221.24] by interlize.com.br [200.244.92.2] with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v5.0.5.R) for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:43:47 -0300 Subject: Re: Should mplayer be build with Win32 codecs? From: Ricardo Mota To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net In-Reply-To: <20020920181118.A17344@bonzo.nirvana> References: <20020608213903.GA26452@krabat.physik.fu-berlin.de> <20020920181118.A17344@bonzo.nirvana> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8.99 Message-Id: <1032802765.9035.17.camel@Ricardo> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Lookup-Warning: reverse lookup on original sender failed X-Mdremoteip: 200.173.221.24 X-Return-Path: ricardo@mdbcomunicacao.com.br X-Mdaemon-Deliver-To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net X-Mailscanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Sender: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net Errors-To: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net X-Beenthere: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net X-Reply-To: ricardo@mdbcomunicacao.com.br List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Freshrpms RPM discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Original-Date: 23 Sep 2002 14:38:44 -0300 Date: 23 Sep 2002 14:38:44 -0300 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: Hi, First you have to get the win32 files !!! then , you configure using --enable_win32 On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 13:11, Axel Thimm wrote: > Hi, > > has anyone an answer for me? The mplayer documentation still suggests to use > them for x86 architectures. > > Thanks. :) > > Regards, Axel. > > On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 11:39:03PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > Are there perhaps licensing issues, which forbid such a practice? Or any other > > reasons? > > > > The reason I ask is that I have seen performance and also some feature > > differences (fullscreen w/o keeping aspect ratio, visual artifacts on NVIDIA) > > comparing with or without the Win32 codecs. The mplayer authors seem to > > recommend using them for x86 architectures. > > > > Beware, I am no mplayer/codecs/whatever expert, I may be totally lost ... > > -- > Axel.Thimm@physik.fu-berlin.de > > _______________________________________________ > RPM-List mailing list > http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list > _______________________________________________ RPM-List mailing list http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list