From exmh-workers-admin@redhat.com Mon Sep 23 18:31:06 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8B916F03 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:31:05 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:31:05 +0100 (IST) Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8NEmDC21624 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 15:48:13 +0100 Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66EF03F71C; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 10:48:08 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: exmh-workers@listman.example.com Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13733EA02 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 10:41:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8NEfWx16053 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 10:41:32 -0400 Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8NEfWh16049 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 10:41:32 -0400 Received: from austin-jump.vircio.com (IDENT:ccAy5zWQ09Xkwp7bvfjp0++Ajwz36CZN@jump-austin.vircio.com [192.12.3.99]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8NENpi07062 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 10:23:51 -0400 Received: (qmail 12928 invoked by uid 104); 23 Sep 2002 14:41:31 -0000 Received: from cwg-exmh@DeepEddy.Com by localhost.localdomain with qmail-scanner-0.90 (uvscan: v4.1.60/v4224. . Clean. Processed in 0.338467 secs); 23/09/2002 09:41:31 Received: from deepeddy.vircio.com (@[10.1.2.1]) (envelope-sender ) by austin-jump.vircio.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 23 Sep 2002 14:41:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 19676 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2002 14:41:26 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO deepeddy.vircio.com) (?hktCuClL/beEINsOkIbIB+tLe1/MAaET?@[127.0.0.1]) (envelope-sender ) by localhost (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 23 Sep 2002 14:41:26 -0000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Scott Lipcon Cc: exmh-workers@example.com Subject: Re: traceback in new exmh In-Reply-To: <20020923025816.8E7A34A8@mercea.net> References: <20020923025816.8E7A34A8@mercea.net> X-Url: http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg X-Image-Url: http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/chris.gif MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1988991284P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1032792084.19602.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com> From: Chris Garrigues X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.57 Reply-To: Chris Garrigues X-Loop: exmh-workers@example.com Sender: exmh-workers-admin@example.com Errors-To: exmh-workers-admin@example.com X-Beenthere: exmh-workers@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 09:41:22 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,X_LOOP version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: --==_Exmh_1988991284P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > From: Scott Lipcon > Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 22:58:16 -0400 > > I just updated to the latest CVS - I had been running a build from June. > Hitting the Flist button gives the following traceback: > > syntax error in expression "int(17+1+(222-)*(19-17-2)/(224-))" > while executing > "expr int($minLine+1+($msgid-$minMsg)*($maxLine-$minLine-2)/($maxMsg-$minMs > g))" > (procedure "Ftoc_FindMsg" line 57) > invoked from within > "Ftoc_FindMsg $i" > (procedure "Ftoc_ShowSequences" line 16) > invoked from within > "Ftoc_ShowSequences $F" > (procedure "ScanFolder" line 81) > invoked from within > "ScanFolder inbox 0" > invoked from within > "time [list ScanFolder $F $adjustDisplay" > (procedure "Scan_Folder" line 2) > invoked from within > "Scan_Folder $exmh(folder) $ftoc(showNew)" > (procedure "Inc_PresortFinish" line 7) > invoked from within > "Inc_PresortFinish" > invoked from within > ".fops.flist invoke" > ("uplevel" body line 1) > invoked from within > "uplevel #0 [list $w invoke]" > (procedure "tkButtonUp" line 7) > invoked from within > "tkButtonUp .fops.flist > " > (command bound to event) > > > It seems to only happen in a folder with no unseen messages. > > Chris, is this related to your recent changes? Curious. I changed the arguments to Ftoc_ShowSequences to drop the folder argument and instead have an optional msgids argument. Somehow your version of ScanFolder is still trying to pass $F. You seem to have the latest ftoc.tcl (1.36), but not the latest scan.tcl (1.27). I don't know how that happened, but try getting your source tree completely up to date. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ virCIO http://www.virCIO.Com 716 Congress, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78701 +1 512 374 0500 World War III: The Wrong-Doers Vs. the Evil-Doers. --==_Exmh_1988991284P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.2_20000822 06/23/2000 iD8DBQE9jygSK9b4h5R0IUIRAix6AJ9CorKpwn/5KatPB2QytCyr1mVP5QCfd84d CBV9usxWABobTcDTVHm8fLY= =xJhj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1988991284P-- _______________________________________________ Exmh-workers mailing list Exmh-workers@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers