From rpm-list-admin@freshrpms.net Fri Sep 20 17:34:44 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2611316F03 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 17:34:44 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 20 Sep 2002 17:34:44 +0100 (IST) Received: from egwn.net (ns2.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8KGHRC13022 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 17:17:27 +0100 Received: from auth02.nl.egwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g8KGC2f20417; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:12:02 +0200 Received: from mailout10.sul.t-online.com (mailout10.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.21]) by egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g8KGBVf20368 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:11:32 +0200 Received: from fwd11.sul.t-online.de by mailout10.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 17sQNO-0001u3-08; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:11:30 +0200 Received: from puariko.homeip.net (520039812576-0001@[217.231.206.155]) by fmrl11.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 17sQNE-01U7NoC; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:11:20 +0200 From: Axel Thimm To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net Subject: Re: Should mplayer be build with Win32 codecs? Message-Id: <20020920181118.A17344@bonzo.nirvana> References: <20020608213903.GA26452@krabat.physik.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020608213903.GA26452@krabat.physik.fu-berlin.de>; from Axel.Thimm@physik.fu-berlin.de on Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 11:39:03PM +0200 X-Sender: 520039812576-0001@t-dialin.net X-Mailscanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Sender: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net Errors-To: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net X-Beenthere: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Freshrpms RPM discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Original-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:11:18 +0200 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:11:18 +0200 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: Hi, has anyone an answer for me? The mplayer documentation still suggests to use them for x86 architectures. Thanks. :) Regards, Axel. On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 11:39:03PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > Are there perhaps licensing issues, which forbid such a practice? Or any other > reasons? > > The reason I ask is that I have seen performance and also some feature > differences (fullscreen w/o keeping aspect ratio, visual artifacts on NVIDIA) > comparing with or without the Win32 codecs. The mplayer authors seem to > recommend using them for x86 architectures. > > Beware, I am no mplayer/codecs/whatever expert, I may be totally lost ... -- Axel.Thimm@physik.fu-berlin.de _______________________________________________ RPM-List mailing list http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list