From exmh-workers-admin@redhat.com Wed Sep 11 21:29:20 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA8F516F03 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 21:29:18 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 11 Sep 2002 21:29:18 +0100 (IST) Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8BJvlC29695 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 20:57:47 +0100 Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF63E403DA; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:58:06 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: exmh-workers@listman.example.com Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C15340E51 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:56:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8BJucr27588 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:56:38 -0400 Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8BJuck27584 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:56:38 -0400 Received: from qiclab.scn.rain.com (postfix@qiclab.scn.rain.com [205.238.26.97]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8BJe9w01356 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:40:09 -0400 Received: by qiclab.scn.rain.com (Postfix, from userid 177) id 4C64224E158; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:56:36 -0700 (PDT) >Received: by joseph.doink.com (Postfix, from userid 11334) id 92D352FEAB; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:53:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dOink.COM (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by joseph.doink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB8F4BDC3; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:53:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 Cc: Hacksaw , exmh-workers@example.com X-Message-Flag: After so many viruses, why are you still using Outlook? X-Priority: 3 Subject: Re: exmh bug? In-Reply-To: <200209111917.PAA02912@blackcomb.panasas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Kevin Cosgrove Message-Id: <20020911195312.92D352FEAB@joseph.doink.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Loop: exmh-workers@example.com Sender: exmh-workers-admin@example.com Errors-To: exmh-workers-admin@example.com X-Beenthere: exmh-workers@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:53:10 -0700 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=7.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST, MISSING_HEADERS,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,X_LOOP version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: Gotta wonder what the GPG config stuff in ~/.exmh/exmh-defaults looks like. Also gotta wonder what the message headers in the offending message are saying to nmh/exmh. My set-up works perfectly. That is, I get a pop-up window to enter my passphrase into, and when I type it correctly, the message display changes from a prompt to click to decrypt to the message content. TTFN.... On 11 September 2002 at 12:17, Brent Welch wrote: Hmm - I'm cc'ing the exmh-workers list, because I really don't know much about the various PGP interfaces. I think there has been some talk about "issues" with the latest version of gpg. >>>Hacksaw said: > version 2.5 08/15/2002 > Linux habitrail.home.fools-errant.com 2.4.7-10smp #1 SMP Thu Sep 6 17:09:31 > EDT 2001 i686 unknown > Tk 8.3 Tcl 8.3 > > It's not clear to me this is a bug with exmh per se, but it's > something that manifests through exmh, so I figured asking you > might help me track it down. > > When I receive a gpg encrypted message, and it asks me for a > passphrase, it first tries to ask me via the tty under which > exmh is running. It tells me my passphrase is incorrect every > time, at which point exmh offers me the line in the message > about decrypting. I click the line and it offers me the dialog > box, and tells me the passphrase is correct, and shows me the > decrypted message. > > Any ideas on that? > -- > Honour necessity. > http://www.hacksaw.org -- http://www.privatecircus.com -- KB1FVD _______________________________________________ Exmh-workers mailing list Exmh-workers@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers