From exmh-users-admin@redhat.com Wed Sep 11 16:03:23 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B88116F20 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:03:21 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:03:21 +0100 (IST) Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8BDRcC16348 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 14:27:38 +0100 Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814B54002C; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:28:03 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: exmh-users@listman.example.com Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A065D3F65F for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:27:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8BDRVS32571 for exmh-users@listman.redhat.com; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:27:31 -0400 Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8BDRVk32567 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:27:31 -0400 Received: from dimebox.bmc.com (adsl-66-140-152-233.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net [66.140.152.233]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8BDB4w09569 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:11:05 -0400 Received: by dimebox.bmc.com (Postfix, from userid 1205) id 143BB38DA9; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 08:27:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dimebox (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dimebox.bmc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069E838DA2 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 08:27:30 -0500 (CDT) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 In-Reply-To: <9996.1031730908@kanga.nu> References: <200209102325.g8ANP2KX022602@fsck.intern.waldner.priv.at> <9996.1031730908@kanga.nu> Comments: In-reply-to J C Lawrence message dated "Wed, 11 Sep 2002 00:55:08 -0700." To: exmh-users@example.com Subject: Re: Sorting MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Hal DeVore X-Image-Url: http://www.geocities.com/hal_devore_ii/haleye48.gif Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <14343.1031750844@dimebox> X-Loop: exmh-users@example.com Sender: exmh-users-admin@example.com Errors-To: exmh-users-admin@example.com X-Beenthere: exmh-users@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: exmh-users@example.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 08:27:24 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.6 required=7.0 tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_03_05,WORK_AT_HOME,X_LOOP version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: >> I run exmh on my desktops at home and at work with the resulting exmh >> windows being displayed on both my work and home desktops (gratis SSH >> X11 forwarding). In fact, your message was read and replied to (this >> message) while at work, using an exmh instance running on my home >> machine. Just to throw in another approach to solving the same problem. I run two copies of exmh, one at work, one at home. They both display on a "virtual X server" created by vncserver on the home box. I connect to that virtual X server using vncviewer wherever I happen to be. The VNC connection is tunneled over ssh and is carried over the Internet via an IPSEC appliance. That gives me access to both home and work email from either place without the complications involved in having two copies of exmh working on the same set of folders. It's a tad slow viewing work email when I'm at work ... but not so bad that I can't stand it. --Hal _______________________________________________ Exmh-users mailing list Exmh-users@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users