From exmh-users-admin@redhat.com Tue Sep 10 11:23:42 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEE316F03 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:23:42 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:23:42 +0100 (IST) Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8A8MCC23007 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:22:13 +0100 Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 470A03F3CC; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 04:22:22 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: exmh-users@listman.example.com Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124A73EA64 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 04:21:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8A8L1i24928 for exmh-users@listman.redhat.com; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 04:21:01 -0400 Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8A8L0m24924 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 04:21:00 -0400 Received: from dingo.home.kanga.nu (ocker.kanga.nu [198.144.204.213]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8A84ev13908 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 04:04:40 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=dingo.home.kanga.nu) by dingo.home.kanga.nu with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17ogGX-0007n7-00 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 01:20:57 -0700 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=kanga.nu) by dingo.home.kanga.nu with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17ogGW-0007n0-00 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 01:20:56 -0700 To: exmh-users@example.com Subject: Re: Sorting In-Reply-To: Message from Tom Reingold of "Mon, 09 Sep 2002 15:36:37 EDT." <20020909193637.590BBB1@whatexit.org> References: <20020909193637.590BBB1@whatexit.org> X-Face: ?^_yw@fA`CEX&}--=*&XqXbF-oePvxaT4(kyt\nwM9]{]N!>b^K}-Mb9 YH%saz^>nq5usBlD"s{(.h'_w|U^3ldUq7wVZz$`u>MB(-4$f\a6Eu8.e=Pf\ X-Image-Url: http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/kanga.face.tiff X-Url: http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Message-Id: <29945.1031646056@kanga.nu> X-Envelope-To: exmh-users@example.com From: J C Lawrence X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.58 X-Tmda-Fingerprint: cW2GfTfrr9KCw5sTO3gaUCJfK8Q X-Loop: exmh-users@example.com Sender: exmh-users-admin@example.com Errors-To: exmh-users-admin@example.com X-Beenthere: exmh-users@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: exmh-users@example.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 01:20:56 -0700 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.9 required=7.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,X_LOOP version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: On Mon, 09 Sep 2002 15:36:37 -0400 Tom Reingold wrote: > At work, I have to use Outlook. Ick. I hate it. Ahh. At work we fire people who use Outlook (Literally true: They get escorted to the door, their badge confiscated, and told to return the next day to collect their office contents). > But it does a few things right. Like making indices for each folder, > and not just by date, but also by sender, message size, subject. So I > can sort by any column instantly. Have you looked into using a custom sequences file? > And mime handling is pretty bad compared with modern mailers. The only thing I actually miss in that regard is support for S/MIME. -- J C Lawrence ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. claw@kanga.nu He lived as a devil, eh? http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live. _______________________________________________ Exmh-users mailing list Exmh-users@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users