From exmh-users-admin@redhat.com Tue Sep 3 14:20:18 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0A216F40 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 14:18:48 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 03 Sep 2002 14:18:48 +0100 (IST) Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8322hZ01052 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 03:02:44 +0100 Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31DB93F4F6; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 22:03:01 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: exmh-users@listman.example.com Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C093FFC4 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 22:02:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g83223J31599 for exmh-users@listman.redhat.com; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 22:02:03 -0400 Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g83223Y31570 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 22:02:03 -0400 Received: from blackcomb.panasas.com (gw2.panasas.com [65.194.124.178]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g831kQl32226 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 21:46:26 -0400 Received: from medlicott.panasas.com (IDENT:welch@medlicott.panasas.com [172.17.132.188]) by blackcomb.panasas.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA01468; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 22:01:50 -0400 Message-Id: <200209030201.WAA01468@blackcomb.panasas.com> To: Reg Clemens Cc: exmh-users@example.com Subject: Re: ARRRGHHH Had GPG working, now it doesnt. In-Reply-To: <200209021953.g82Jrerq003365@orion.dwf.com> References: <200209021953.g82Jrerq003365@orion.dwf.com> Comments: In-reply-to Reg Clemens message dated "Mon, 02 Sep 2002 13:53:40 -0600." From: Brent Welch X-Url: http://www.panasas.com/ X-Face: "HxE|?EnC9fVMV8f70H83&{fgLE.|FZ^$>@Q(yb#N,Eh~N]e&]=>r5~UnRml1:4EglY{9B+ :'wJq$@c_C!l8@<$t,{YUr4K,QJGHSvS~U]H`<+L*x?eGzSk>XH\W:AK\j?@?c1o List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 19:01:49 -0700 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.3 required=7.0 tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,X_LOOP version=2.41-cvs X-Spam-Level: 2 things - first, the switch parser changed in a subtle way with 8.4 - byte-code compilation was added, and it is slightly more strict in its parsing than the original parser. You can only have a comment where Tcl would expect to find a command. Switch has a "pattern - body" strucutre, so if you goof and put a comment where it is trying to find a pattern, both of you will be confused with the results. The subtlty arises with extra whitespace and newlines. I can't give you the exact case, but I know exmh had one example that stopped parsing correctly, and was arguably wrong before. 2nd - I've managed to remain fairly ignoranat of the PGP support in exmh, so you'll have to dig in yourself or see if someone else on exmh-users or exmh-workers is having similar problems. >>>Reg Clemens said: > > If you haven't already, you should enable the debug log under > > Hacking Support preferences and look for clues there. > > > > >>>Reg Clemens said: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Sun, 01 Sep 2002 00:05:03 MDT Reg Clemens wrote: > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > in messages with GnuPG signatures. But punching the line ALWAYS > > > > > gives > > > > > > > > > > Signature made Thu Aug 29 00:27:17 2002 MDT using DSA key I D BDD > > F997A > > > > > Can't check signature: public key not found > > > > > > > > > > So, something else is missing. > > > > > > > > Yes, the public key of the signature you want to check :-). > > > > > > > > Are you really sure that you have the public key of the message's > > > > signature? If not, try downloading it or try to check a signature fro m > > > > which you know you have the public key. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ah, sorry for not making that clearer. > > > But no. > > > Previously (v1.0.6 of GnuPG) there would be a slight pause at this poin t whi > > le > > > it went out to get the public key from a keyserver. > > > Now, whether I have the key or NOT, I get the failure message. > > > > > > Its as if it cant find gpg to execute it (but I fixed that path), so th ere > > > must be something else that I am missing... > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Reg.Clemens > > > reg@dwf.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Exmh-users mailing list > > > Exmh-users@redhat.com > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users > > > > -- > > Brent Welch > > Software Architect, Panasas Inc > > Pioneering the World's Most Scalable and Agile Storage Network > > www.panasas.com > > welch@panasas.com > > > > > Partial solution. > And this MAY be related to using tcl/tk 8.4b1, as I had a similar > problem about a month ago elsewhere in EXMH (which you found). > > But first. > I really feel like something has changed out from under me > with my making no changes to EXMH. Namely, when I first got > GPG up and working (for reading signatures) all I did was > touch the 'Check Signature' button' and it went out and queried > the keyserver for me. > Now Im getting a separate box, after the failure to find the > public key on my keyring, asking me of I want to 'Query keyserver' > > I KNOW that I never had to touch a 'Query keyserver' button in > the past, but there it is now, and I havent touched EXMH. Spooky. > > I have been working back and forth between GPG 1.0.6 and 1.0.7 > but its not clear how that could be the problem, as Im now getting > the 'Query' message when running either... > > --- > > OK, enough about my confusion. > The CURRENT problem seems to be a COMMENT in a SWITCH statement > at line 86 in pgpWWW.tcl. Tcl 8.4b1 doesnt like it and I get your > popup box. Remove it and no popupbox, but EXMH hangs (sigh). > So, not a complete solution, but at least a start. > > Thanks for the interest. > > Reg.Clemens > reg@dwf.com -- Brent Welch Software Architect, Panasas Inc Pioneering the World's Most Scalable and Agile Storage Network www.panasas.com welch@panasas.com _______________________________________________ Exmh-users mailing list Exmh-users@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users