From exmh-workers-admin@redhat.com Mon Aug 26 23:40:32 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37BB744156 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 18:40:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 26 Aug 2002 23:40:29 +0100 (IST) Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7QMdsZ12703 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 23:39:55 +0100 Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29093F9B1; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 18:40:02 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: exmh-workers@listman.example.com Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEFB3F553 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 18:38:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g7QMcHo02036 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 18:38:17 -0400 Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7QMcHY02032 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 18:38:17 -0400 Received: from milou.dyndns.org (h189n1fls22o974.telia.com [213.64.79.189]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7QMNMl19536 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 18:23:22 -0400 Received: by milou.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id AB8A13F21; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 00:38:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tippex.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by milou.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C793F20; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 00:38:10 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5_20020826 01/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: exmh-workers@example.com Subject: Re: Exmh && speed In-Reply-To: Message from Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu of "Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:22:46 EDT." <200208261822.g7QIMk7P005756@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Anders Eriksson Message-Id: <20020826223810.AB8A13F21@milou.dyndns.org> X-Loop: exmh-workers@example.com Sender: exmh-workers-admin@example.com Errors-To: exmh-workers-admin@example.com X-Beenthere: exmh-workers@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 00:38:05 +0200 X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times. X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.1 required=7.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,X_LOOP version=2.40-cvs X-Spam-Level: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu said: > I checked on a number of small messages in a big folder (~10000 > msgs). The delay of the Next button has increased considerably: > > 2.5-release: 350-450 msec > latest cvs: 1000-12000 msec > I'm not seeing a hit on 'next'. A quick "just pound on 'next' and > watch the wall clock" test shows me able to go through 20 messages in > under 5 seconds, so it's well under 250ms per switch, but I'm seeing a > really piggy CPU spike (100% for a few seconds) in the 'flist' code. > Of course, it seems to be related to number-of-folders: > [~] wc Mail/.folders > 131 131 1122 Mail/.folders I have 167 folders (!) and run with bg-proc set to flist (1 minute). I see delays, but not that much. Maybe 1-3 seconds (which tend to disappear these days). This is on a PII-266. BR, /A _______________________________________________ Exmh-workers mailing list Exmh-workers@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers