From fork-admin@xent.com Wed Oct 2 17:52:11 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E3016F1A for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 17:51:18 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 02 Oct 2002 17:51:18 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g92GgFK17580 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 17:42:16 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F2829413C; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from crank.slack.net (slack.net [166.84.151.181]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C76E29409C for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:42:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by crank.slack.net (Postfix, from userid 596) id 02BF93ED83; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 12:46:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by crank.slack.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5DE3ED79 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 12:46:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Tom To: fork@example.com Subject: Re: ActiveBuddy In-Reply-To: Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 12:46:45 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,USER_AGENT_PINE version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: Wow, if they put a VRML front end on it it would be 100% worthless rather than just 99% IRC...Bots....scripts.....been there done that and much better. If these folks actualy saw the xddc instafilesharing scripts must 12 year olds hang off of Mirc they might get a clue, then again they might already have teh clue that sometimes you can packege the obvious and sell it to the clueless.