From fork-admin@xent.com Mon Sep 30 19:58:57 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6902316F16 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 19:57:31 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 30 Sep 2002 19:57:31 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8UHFEK09117 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:15:15 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30ED2940E0; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 10:15:09 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from hotmail.com (dav72.law15.hotmail.com [64.4.22.207]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF87129409E for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 10:14:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 10:14:09 -0700 X-Originating-Ip: [207.202.171.254] From: "Mr. FoRK" To: References: <3D9859B9.3A7F80C2@endeavors.com> <10654501659.20020930110821@magnesium.net> Subject: Re: Re[2]: A moment of silence for the First Amendment (fwd) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Message-Id: X-Originalarrivaltime: 30 Sep 2002 17:14:09.0728 (UTC) FILETIME=[CA459C00:01C268A4] Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 10:19:12 -0700 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, T_OUTLOOK_REPLY,T_URI_COUNT_0_1 version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: ----- Original Message ----- From: > People are screaming and shouting over the political figures because > they cannot be heard in any other way. What, are they illiterate? Mute? What's their problem? If somebody stops them from posting web pages, or printing newsletters, or talking on the phone, or organizing their /own/ conference then that would be wrong. I don't think free speech is a license to speak directly at and be in the physical presence of any particular individual of your choosing - especially when that individual is busy doing something else and isn't interested.