From fork-admin@xent.com Thu Sep 26 11:04:57 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2D416F03 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 11:04:56 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 26 Sep 2002 11:04:56 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8Q0i6C24938 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 01:44:07 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66880294171; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 17:40:09 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from barrera.org (cpe-65-172-233-109.sanbrunocable.com [65.172.233.109]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F4229409A for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 17:39:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from (127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]) by MailEnable Inbound Mail Agent with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 00:40:54 -08:00 Message-Id: <3D925796.6070305@barrera.org> From: "Joseph S. Barrera III" Organization: NERV User-Agent: KayPro Perfect Writer 1.31S X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FoRK Subject: Re: dumb question: X client behind a firewall? References: <3D924040.1080303@barrera.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 17:40:54 -0700 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,NOSPAM_INC,REFERENCES,USER_AGENT, X_ACCEPT_LANG version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: Wow, three replies already, all recommending ssh. Thanks! - Joe Back in my day, they didn't have ssh. Then again, back in my day, they didn't have firewalls. And I still miss X10's active icons.