From fork-admin@xent.com Mon Sep 23 22:47:42 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1357016F03 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 22:47:42 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 23 Sep 2002 22:47:42 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8NKvxC02420 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 21:57:59 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7F62940B3; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:54:08 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from cats.ucsc.edu (cats-mx2.ucsc.edu [128.114.129.35]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD5C29409A for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:53:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Tycho (dhcp-55-196.cse.ucsc.edu [128.114.55.196]) by cats.ucsc.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id g8NKuTT20027 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:56:29 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jim Whitehead" To: Subject: RE: Goodbye Global Warming Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Ucsc-Cats-Mailscanner: Found to be clean Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:53:56 -0700 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: > J> For anyone to fully bury global warming, they would need to > J> explain why the dramatic increase in CO2 concentrations are not > J> increasing the global temperature. You have not explained why the increase in CO2 concentrations is not contributing to increasing global temperature. > This too was not news to the theoreticians: All > that has happened is that NASA has confirmed the naiive convection > concerns. Precisely which theoreticians do you mean? What, exactly, do you mean by a global warming theoretician -- scientists in this area don't use that term. I assure you that not all scientists performing modeling of global temperature phenomena agree with your assertions. - Jim