From fork-admin@xent.com Fri Sep 20 11:32:49 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D67916F03 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:32:48 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:32:48 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8K2ZoC17214 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 03:35:50 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1531D294170; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 19:32:06 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from qu.to (njl.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.218.112.39]) by xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E1DD729409C for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 19:31:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 29405 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2002 02:39:53 -0000 From: Ned Jackson Lovely To: fork@example.com Subject: Re: Hanson's Sept 11 message in the National Review Message-Id: <20020920023953.GH1024@ibu.internal.qu.to> References: <3D89BEA8.4010107@permafrost.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i X-Cell: +1.617.877.3444 X-Web: http://www.njl.us/ Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 22:39:53 -0400 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE, USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 11:11:47AM -0400, Bill Stoddard wrote: > people? Either these folks are social misfits who have no understanding of > human interactions (else they would try more constructive means to get their > message across) or they are just out to get their rocks off regardless of > how it affects other people, and that is immoral at best and downright evil > at worst. Are you kidding? It was fucking BRILLIANT. Do you know what exposure that got them? They sat perfectly so that the cameras could focus on the mildly exasperated Rumsfeld and their "UN Inspections not war" banner. That picture will be dominating the news cycles in China, Iraq, Russia, Germany, and France, at least. For goodness sakes, you're arguing about it on FoRK. In politics by sound-bite, those two rude hags kicked ass and took names. For the record, I don't think they even got arrested, which is a shame. It is part of the game -- make an ass of yourself, get your point on the nightly news, spend a couple days in the clink for disorderly. -- njl