From fork-admin@xent.com Wed Sep 18 14:06:40 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A4716F03 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 14:06:39 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 18 Sep 2002 14:06:39 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8IBUcC27697 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 12:30:39 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EEED2940E1; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 04:27:05 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from permafrost.net (unknown [64.5.214.38]) by xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A5332940E0 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 04:26:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 767 invoked by uid 1000); 18 Sep 2002 11:21:39 -0000 From: "Owen Byrne" To: Paul Prescod Cc: Owen Byrne , fork@example.com Subject: Re: Hanson's Sept 11 message in the National Review Message-Id: <20020918112139.GA740@www.NT-NETWORK> References: <96394F38-CA61-11D6-A53C-003065F93D3A@topsail.org> <20020917173852.GB5613@www.NT-NETWORK> <3D87FCD5.8000302@prescod.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D87FCD5.8000302@prescod.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 08:21:39 -0300 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 09:11:01PM -0700, Paul Prescod wrote: > Owen Byrne wrote: > >... > > > >Except that parroting the party line doesn't really require much > >freedom of speech. Now if you had posted something from a left of > >center source, you would have been shouted down in flames, buried in > >ad hominem attacks, and probably get your name added to an FBI list. > > Do you think it is really useful to combat hysterical right-wing > propoganda with hysterical left-wing propoganda? > Sure it is - it tends to bring out the people who let "hysterical right wing propaganda" spew forth, while reaching for their gun whenever a "liberal" enters the room. my hysterical left wing "propaganda" is generally an emotional reaction on a mailing list, not an organizaed attempt at converting people's thinking through lies and distortion (as was the original article). Whereas your constant and predictable brandings of my postings are, to my mind, a deliberate and reasoned effort to reduce debate, and discourage left of center postngs. Owen