From fork-admin@xent.com Tue Sep 17 18:42:36 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831BA16F03 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 18:42:36 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 17 Sep 2002 18:42:36 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8HHKeC20202 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 18:20:48 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8BE2940DE; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 10:17:05 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from hughes-fe01.direcway.com (hughes-fe01.direcway.com [66.82.20.91]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EAC029409F for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 10:16:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spinnaker ([64.157.32.1]) by hughes-fe01.direcway.com (InterMail vK.4.04.00.00 201-232-137 license dcc4e84cb8fc01ca8f8654c982ec8526) with ESMTP id <20020917171953.BJNK977.hughes-fe01@spinnaker> for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:19:53 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: Hanson's Sept 11 message in the National Review From: Chuck Murcko To: fork@example.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <96394F38-CA61-11D6-A53C-003065F93D3A@topsail.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.482) Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 10:19:13 -0700 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=7.0 tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST, USER_AGENT_APPLEMAIL version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: Probably because we have this pesky 1st Amendment thing here. Still, lots of us in the States have developed a disturbing tendency to shout down or (in recent years) shackle in legal BS opinions, thoughts, and individual behaviors we don't agree with. You can just ignore it if you wish. But I must feel obligated to defend to the death your right to do so. Chuck On Monday, September 16, 2002, at 06:54 AM, Robert Harley wrote: The usual crud. Why do morons ranting and beating their chests in the National Review (or similar rags) merit FoRKing?