From fork-admin@xent.com Tue Sep 17 18:42:39 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B71216F03 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 18:42:39 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 17 Sep 2002 18:42:39 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8HHbbC20660 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 18:37:37 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8212940E8; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 10:34:05 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from towel.boston.ximian.com (gateway.ximian.com [141.154.95.125]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BBA729409F for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 10:33:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from louie@localhost) by towel.boston.ximian.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8HHaok02484 for fork@xent.com; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:36:50 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: towel.boston.ximian.com: louie set sender to louie@ximian.com using -f Subject: Re: Slaughter in the Name of God From: Luis Villa To: fork@example.com In-Reply-To: <20020917165028.4F4EA16F03@example.com> References: <20020917165028.4F4EA16F03@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1032284209.2347.186.camel@towel.boston.ximian.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.1.1.99 (Preview Release) Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: 17 Sep 2002 13:36:49 -0400 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.6 required=7.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,X_AUTH_WARNING version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 12:50, Justin Mason wrote: > What about Tibetan Buddhism BTW? They seem like an awfully nice bunch > of chaps (and chapesses). They were the ruling class of a feudal, farming society for quite some time; I believe there were more than a few issues there. Certainly, not everyone in Tibet is as excited about the Dalai Lama as Hollywood appears to be. [Not that the Chinese are much better rights-wise, but they've actually built roads and such, which led to the creation of merchant classes and the like that never existed under the Tibetans.] Luis