From fork-admin@xent.com  Tue Sep 17 18:42:38 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E307E16F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 18:42:37 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 17 Sep 2002 18:42:37 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8HHRaC20431 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Tue, 17 Sep 2002 18:27:37 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 526962940ED; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 10:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from argote.ch (argote.ch [80.65.224.17]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id C1FCC29409F for <fork@xent.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 10:23:31
    -0700 (PDT)
Received: by argote.ch (Postfix, from userid 500) id A1DBDC44D;
    Tue, 17 Sep 2002 19:26:27 +0200 (CEST)
To: fork@example.com
Subject: Re: Hanson's Sept 11 message in the National Review
Message-Id: <20020917172627.A1DBDC44D@argote.ch>
From: harley@argote.ch (Robert Harley)
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 19:26:27 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

Chuck Murcko wrote:
> > The usual crud.  Why do morons ranting and beating their chests in the
> > National Review (or similar rags) merit FoRKing?
> Probably because we have this pesky 1st Amendment thing here.  [...]

It must be so great in the US.  The rest of us live in caves and have
no such thing as free speech.
 
BTW, I wasn't aware that the 1st Amendment mandated that crap must be FoRKed.


> You can just ignore it if you wish.

I will, thanks.


> But I must feel obligated to defend to the death your right to do so.

«Je désapprouve ce que vous dites, mais je défendrai jusqu'à ma mort votre
droit de le dire»
- Arouet Le Jeune, dit «Voltaire» (1694-1778).


R