From fork-admin@xent.com Wed Sep 11 19:42:20 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB50A16F03 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 19:42:20 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 11 Sep 2002 19:42:20 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8BIQeC26236 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 19:26:43 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3AF294197; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:23:04 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from venus.phpwebhosting.com (venus.phpwebhosting.com [64.29.16.27]) by xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D715929409A for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:22:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 32002 invoked by uid 508); 11 Sep 2002 18:24:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hydrogen.leitl.org) (62.226.149.78) by venus.phpwebhosting.com with SMTP; 11 Sep 2002 18:24:47 -0000 Received: from localhost (eugen@localhost) by hydrogen.leitl.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8BIOej25918; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 20:24:41 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: hydrogen.leitl.org: eugen owned process doing -bs From: Eugen Leitl To: Gary Lawrence Murphy Cc: Udhay Shankar N , Adam Rifkin , Subject: Re: storage bits In-Reply-To: Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 20:24:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=7.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE,X_AUTH_WARNING version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: On 11 Sep 2002, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote: > So then why does my webhost _still_ only give me 200MB? Because ~10 krpm server SCSII doesn't follow the curve. Most rackspace is ridiculously expensive/unit, so people don't use low end EIDE hardware there.