From fork-admin@xent.com Mon Sep 9 19:28:13 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C68F16EFC for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 19:28:12 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 09 Sep 2002 19:28:12 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g89I6gC26382 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 19:06:43 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0928D2942E9; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 11:00:05 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from mail.evergo.net (unknown [206.191.151.2]) by xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id ED9D22942BF for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 11:00:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 18058 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2002 18:02:49 -0000 Received: from dsl.206.191.151.102.evergo.net (HELO JMHALL) (206.191.151.102) by mail.evergo.net with SMTP; 9 Sep 2002 18:02:49 -0000 Reply-To: From: "John Hall" To: "FoRK" Subject: RE: Recommended Viewing Message-Id: <002301c2582b$1c040a20$0200a8c0@JMHALL> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 11:02:49 -0700 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=7.0 tests=AWL,INVALID_MSGID,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,TO_LOCALPART_EQ_REAL version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: Isn't this the story where someone's "Dream" has the ability to change reality -- then you find the whole world is their dream? > -----Original Message----- > From: fork-admin@xent.com [mailto:fork-admin@xent.com] On Behalf Of Geege > Schuman > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:26 AM > To: John Evdemon > Cc: fork@example.com > Subject: RE: Recommended Viewing > > Agreed, completely. I totally grokked the notion of unintened consequence > with the original. > > -----Original Message----- > From: fork-admin@xent.com [mailto:fork-admin@xent.com]On Behalf Of John > Evdemon > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 7:03 AM > To: Fork@xent.com > Subject: Re: Recommended Viewing > > > On 8 Sep 2002 at 22:15, Geege Schuman wrote: > > > who watched Lathe of Heaven? (A&E, 8 pm EDT) who has seen > > the original? > > > By "original" if you are referring to the old PBS version, I liked that > version much better. Much more thought provoking. > > >