From fork-admin@xent.com Mon Sep 9 14:34:36 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2895A16EFC for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 14:34:36 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 09 Sep 2002 14:34:36 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g89BrGC12442 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 12:53:17 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94B72942D3; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 04:50:04 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from isolnetsux.techmonkeys.net (isolnetsux.techmonkeys.net [64.243.46.20]) by xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 53ADC2941D7 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 04:49:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 4755 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2002 11:51:52 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Sep 2002 11:51:52 -0000 From: Chris Haun X-X-Sender: chris@isolnetsux.techmonkeys.net To: Eugen Leitl Cc: CDale , Tom , Gordon Mohr , Subject: Re: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 07:51:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.9 required=7.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT_PINE version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: ok i read back, thats not a typo, you mean three thousand lovers. where do you get your data? It seems very unlikely, but if you have supporting evidence i'd like to see it. Chris On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Eugen Leitl wrote: > On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, CDale wrote: > > > I agree w/ ya Tom. That kind of thinking is SO idiotic. Sure, gays > > So how many of your hetero friends had >3 k lovers? > > > are promiscuous, and so are hets, but I betcha gays are more > > AIDSphobic than hets, generally speaking.... > > The virus load issue is orthogonal to the fact. Bzzt. Switch on your > brain, you both. I was mentioning that a subpopulation outside of the sex > industry is/used to be extremely promiscuous, about two orders of > magnitude higher than average. > > >