From fork-admin@xent.com Fri Sep 6 11:42:50 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453DE16F22 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 11:40:07 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:40:07 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g86AI4C31652 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 11:18:04 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958CC294299; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 03:15:03 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from venus.phpwebhosting.com (venus.phpwebhosting.com [64.29.16.27]) by xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B8F9294298 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 03:14:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 10193 invoked by uid 508); 6 Sep 2002 10:16:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hydrogen.leitl.org) (217.80.40.31) by venus.phpwebhosting.com with SMTP; 6 Sep 2002 10:16:34 -0000 Received: from localhost (eugen@localhost) by hydrogen.leitl.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g86AGUi01401; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 12:16:30 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: hydrogen.leitl.org: eugen owned process doing -bs From: Eugen Leitl To: CDale Cc: , "Adam L. Beberg" , Subject: Re[2]: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 12:16:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=7.0 tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,TO_LOCALPART_EQ_REAL, USER_AGENT_PINE,X_AUTH_WARNING version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, CDale wrote: > It also depends on what the fad is or what is in style. (: DNA's idea of fads is on the 100 kiloyear scale, unfortunately. As long as current fads don't involve in-vivo rewrite of the genome, homeoboxes including (now there's a problem for you, homeoboxing the adult), they're not all that smart an idear. > Actualy our silly antiquated ideas about relationships and love have > resulted in the bleedings of many upon many a page (and musical > instrumnet, and canvas) What's the problem if we dash a little Mrs. Art is sure nice. However, if art is our first priority we're kinda fux0red, if we've set our sight on a sustainable culture. > Dash on them? (: Or cayenne. Or ginger. (mm ask me about ginger > root play). > > And let me tell you this: just because a child happens to be > single-parented (what a word), does not mean that child is > dysfunctional or lives in a dysfunctional home. The govt/media/church Our firmware is not built to be single-parented. You can counteract that somewhat by exposing the kid to a community of close friends, but not too many do that. > has tried to make it look like there is a disintegration, when in > fact, there is a coming together of other family members and friends > to raise children. It's not decaying -- it's changing. Nothing wrong > with change. I don't know what exactly is wrong, but something is definitely wrong. This is way too important to be left to just our intuition of what is right and what is wrong. > > At least from the viewpoint of demographics sustainability and > > counterpressure to gerontocracy and resulting innovatiophobia we're doing > > something wrong. > > > > Maybe we should really go dirty Tleilaxu all the way. > > > > Maybe y'all should buy m-w some more bandwidth. m-w?