From fork-admin@xent.com Mon Aug 26 15:32:00 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7494416E for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:26:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:26:08 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7OF4eZ06772 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 16:04:40 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60FB2940FF; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 07:59:08 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from hotmail.com (f199.law15.hotmail.com [64.4.23.199]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447D92940FF for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 07:58:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 08:00:15 -0700 Received: from 216.30.74.2 by lw15fd.law15.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 15:00:15 GMT X-Originating-Ip: [216.30.74.2] From: "Russell Turpin" To: fork@example.com Subject: Re: The case for spam MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-Id: X-Originalarrivaltime: 24 Aug 2002 15:00:15.0691 (UTC) FILETIME=[F45419B0:01C24B7E] Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 15:00:15 +0000 X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times. X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.7 required=7.0 tests=KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,MSN_FOOTER1,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.40-cvs X-Spam-Level: Lucas Gonze: >Senders should vary the recipient list to include non-targets, like party >officials, and to exclude targets enough to give them plausible >deniability. Which means the sender has a list of who the true targets are, and who the fake targets are, and scripts for mixing these. On the receiving side, my email client distinguishes between messages that are read, and messages that are not. I like to mark or save messages that are particularly interresting or important to me. And even if I make a point to delete "suspicious material" immediately upon reading it, even THAT might leave an interesting kind of trace on my machine. Sorry, but I don't buy the argument that spam protects people who want to distribute or see material the government disapproves. _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork