From rpm-list-admin@freshrpms.net Wed Oct 9 10:53:11 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: zzzz@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC66A16F7C for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:52:11 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for zzzz@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 09 Oct 2002 10:52:11 +0100 (IST) Received: from egwn.net (ns2.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g998YdK26404 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:34:39 +0100 Received: from auth02.nl.egwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g998V3f31189; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:31:03 +0200 Received: from mail.addix.net (kahless.addix.net [195.179.139.19]) by egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g998UHf30709 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:30:17 +0200 Received: from wolf359.ision-cic.de (soran.int.addix.net [212.51.6.15] (may be forged)) by mail.addix.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA26671 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:29:47 +0200 From: Ralf Ertzinger To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net Subject: Re: Apt repository authentication: it's time Message-Id: <20021009102823.0e442ee6.ralf@camperquake.de> In-Reply-To: <20021008175452.581c0e50.kilroy@kamakiriad.com> References: <20021008175452.581c0e50.kilroy@kamakiriad.com> Organization: [NDC] ;-) X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.3claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailscanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Sender: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net Errors-To: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net X-Beenthere: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Freshrpms RPM discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Original-Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:28:23 +0200 Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:28:23 +0200 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.8 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,NOSPAM_INC, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE,T_NONSENSE_FROM_40_50 version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: Hi. Brian Fahrlander wrote: > What's it take to ensure we're covered against this kind of > childish/moronic/Microsoft-era problems? Well, I am checking the packet signatures while building the apt-tree. Not very pretty, not very fast, but it works. Nonetheless: did anyone ever play with this: http://distro.conectiva.com.br/pipermail/apt-rpm/2002-August/000653.html -- R! _______________________________________________ RPM-List mailing list http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list