From fork-admin@xent.com Wed Oct 9 10:55:03 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: zzzz@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C3E16F16 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:52:50 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for zzzz@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 09 Oct 2002 10:52:50 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g98J0UK29943 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 20:00:31 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B8E2940E2; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 12:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (mta6.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.240]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430572940DE for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:59:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cse.ucsc.edu ([63.194.88.161]) by mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001)) with ESMTP id <0H3O00A1ZFGAXP@mta6.snfc21.pbi.net> for fork@xent.com; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 12:00:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Elias Subject: Re: The absurdities of life. To: fork@example.com Reply-To: fork@example.com Message-Id: <3DA3294A.8000209@cse.ucsc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en,pdf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1 References: Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 11:51:54 -0700 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST, RCVD_IN_MULTIHOP_DSBL,RCVD_IN_UNCONFIRMED_DSBL,REFERENCES, T_NONSENSE_FROM_30_40,USER_AGENT,X_ACCEPT_LANG version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: So, given the apparent commonality of these occurances, companies appear to be losing a large amount of money by mailing these tiny checks out. Why can't they simply credit the account in question on the next bill? Granted, if an account has been closed there is no such option... Elias Christopher Haun wrote: > eheh i'll do yah one better i have a check some place (i just moved or i'd > go scan it in) for $0.01 from Time Warner Cable.