From fork-admin@xent.com Fri Aug 23 11:08:55 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: zzzz@localhost.netnoteinc.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D741B47C6F for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 06:06:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for zzzz@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:06:55 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7N1jTZ04367 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 02:45:29 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A11E2940F5; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 18:43:08 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.62]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0CE294099 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 18:42:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Info: This message was accepted for relay by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net as the sender used SMTP authentication X-Trace: UmFuZG9tSVZFFzJmsb6CFx8j2lnFk529F6pHVq8zxRebZ/rkY9nOITB+/+3fN03H5gv+GHxViF4= Received: from eb-174121.od.nih.gov ([156.40.174.121] helo=TOSHIBA-L8QYR7M) by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #6) id 17i3Uv-0007Lj-00 for fork@xent.com; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 21:44:25 -0400 From: "John Evdemon" To: fork@example.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Entrepreneurs Message-Id: <3D655B37.2901.1DB12A@localhost> Priority: normal In-Reply-To: <20020823005705.D63AEC44E@argote.ch> X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.01) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Description: Mail message body Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 21:44:23 -0400 On 23 Aug 2002 at 2:57, Robert Harley wrote: > It's an amusing anecdote, I don't know if it's true or not, > but certainly nothing here supports the authoritative > sounding conclusion "Status: False". I actually thought it was pretty funny and quite accurate. Who cares if the spinmeisters are denying it? http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork