From ilug-admin@linux.ie Fri Aug 23 11:07:47 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: zzzz@localhost.netnoteinc.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F82C4416B for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 06:06:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for zzzz@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:06:31 +0100 (IST) Received: from lugh.tuatha.org (root@lugh.tuatha.org [194.125.145.45]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7MIE5Z19072 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:14:05 +0100 Received: from lugh (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lugh.tuatha.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA15460; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:12:03 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: lugh.tuatha.org: Host root@localhost [127.0.0.1] claimed to be lugh Received: from nwkea-mail-1.sun.com (nwkea-mail-1.sun.com [192.18.42.13]) by lugh.tuatha.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA15419 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:11:56 +0100 Received: from sunire.Ireland.Sun.COM ([129.156.220.30]) by nwkea-mail-1.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA04778 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:11:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sionnach.ireland.sun.com (sionnach [129.156.220.28]) by sunire.Ireland.Sun.COM (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id g7MIBJd19492 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:11:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from sionnach (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sionnach.ireland.sun.com (8.12.2+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g7MIBJdr004189 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:11:19 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <200208221811.g7MIBJdr004189@sionnach.ireland.sun.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: ilug@linux.ie From: Albert White - SUN Ireland Subject: Re: [ILUG] Sun Solaris.. In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 22 Aug 2002 18:42:33 BST." Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:11:19 +0100 Sender: ilug-admin@linux.ie Errors-To: ilug-admin@linux.ie X-Mailman-Version: 1.1 Precedence: bulk List-Id: Irish Linux Users' Group X-Beenthere: ilug@linux.ie > On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, John P. Looney wrote: > > Sun's hardware in general is more reliable, > ROFL. not in our experience. Well at least our Caps-Lock keys work: peter@staunton.ie said: > Another problem. I have a Dell branded keyboard and if I hit Caps-Lock > twice, the whole machine crashes (in Linux, not Windows) - even the on/ > off switch is inactive, leaving me to reach for the power cable > instead. :-P bauwolf@indigo.ie said: > as if he wanted Solaris 9 for x86, he'd be waiting a bit erm... it runs Solaris x86 as standard... Cheers, ~Al -- Expressed in this posting are my opinions. They are in no way related to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems. Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may be fiction rather than truth. -- Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug@linux.ie http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for (un)subscription information. List maintainer: listmaster@linux.ie