59 lines
2.7 KiB
Plaintext
59 lines
2.7 KiB
Plaintext
From rssfeeds@jmason.org Thu Sep 26 16:34:06 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <rssfeeds@spamassassin.taint.org>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org
|
|
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCEB16F17
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:34:04 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:34:04 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from dogma.slashnull.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
|
|
dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8QFRog24243 for
|
|
<jm@jmason.org>; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:27:50 +0100
|
|
Message-Id: <200209261527.g8QFRog24243@dogma.slashnull.org>
|
|
To: yyyy@spamassassin.taint.org
|
|
From: "hyatt@mozilla" <rssfeeds@spamassassin.taint.org>
|
|
Subject: Validation
|
|
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 15:27:49 -0000
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; encoding=utf-8
|
|
|
|
URL: http://www.mozillazine.org/weblogs/hyatt/#85395270
|
|
Date: Not supplied
|
|
|
|
I feel so tremendously validated right now in all my criticisms of Netscape vs.
|
|
Mozilla. I told Netscape management that if the Netscape beta shipped without
|
|
popup blocking that CNet would write an article on it. They didn't believe me
|
|
(or didn't care). Sure enough, the article appeared right on time[1].
|
|
|
|
I blogged about two main annoyances when installing Netscape 7: the lack of
|
|
popup blocking and all of the annoying advertising spam on the desktop and in
|
|
the toolbars. I warned Netscape that they needed to take steps to correct this
|
|
problem. They didn't listen. Take a look at the CNet review[2] highlight that
|
|
describes *The Bad* part of Netscape 7.0:
|
|
|
|
_Displays AOL ads everywhere; doesn't let you turn off pop-up windows like
|
|
Mozilla does; devours 30MB of disk space._
|
|
|
|
Plenty of other engineers at Netscape (as well as managers) complained about
|
|
these problems and fought with those higher up to correct these problems. We
|
|
lost every battle. The simple truth is that the people in charge of running the
|
|
Netscape browser are incompetent. They don't understand how to make a good
|
|
browser, or they don't care. Their engineers tell them what they're doing
|
|
wrong, and they don't listen.
|
|
|
|
Maybe you'll listen to the public. How about eWeek's article, Netscape 7.0
|
|
Shrivels Under Mozilla's Shadow[3]? Are you paying attention now, you ignorant,
|
|
stupid, incompetent buffoons?
|
|
|
|
"I told you so." never felt so good.
|
|
|
|
Maybe they will sit up and take notice now. If they do, well, it's about
|
|
fucking time. And people wonder why I quit working for AOL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] http://news.com.com/2100-1023-949572.html?tag=fd_lede
|
|
[2] http://www.cnet.com/software/0-3227883-8-20331576-1.html?tag=st.sw.8888.boxhl.3227883-8-20331576-1
|
|
[3] http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,493248,00.asp
|
|
|
|
|