28 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
28 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
Return-Path: tim.one@comcast.net
|
|
Delivery-Date: Thu Sep 12 01:44:56 2002
|
|
From: tim.one@comcast.net (Tim Peters)
|
|
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 20:44:56 -0400
|
|
Subject: [Spambayes] XTreme Training
|
|
In-Reply-To: <20020911122308.GB5866@cthulhu.gerg.ca>
|
|
Message-ID: <LNBBLJKPBEHFEDALKOLCAEJEBDAB.tim.one@comcast.net>
|
|
|
|
[Tim]
|
|
>> Why would spam be likely to end up with two instances of Return-Path
|
|
>> in the headers?
|
|
|
|
[Greg Ward]
|
|
> Possibly another qmail-ism from Bruce Guenter's spam collection.
|
|
|
|
Doesn't seem *likely*, as it appeared in about 900 of about 14,000 spams.
|
|
It could be specific to one of his bait addresses, though -- don't know. A
|
|
nice thing about a statistical inferencer is that you really don't have to
|
|
know why a thing works, just whether it works <wink>.
|
|
|
|
> Or maybe Anthony's right about spammers being stupid and blindly copying
|
|
> headers. (Well, of course he's right about spammers being stupid; it's
|
|
> just this particular aspect of stupidity that's open to question.)
|
|
|
|
I'm going to blow it off -- it's just another instance of being pointlessly
|
|
baffled by a mixed corpus half of which I don't know enough about.
|
|
|