GeronBook/Ch3/datasets/spam/easy_ham/01676.b1039d148dbb347b46897...

24 lines
717 B
Plaintext

Return-Path: skip@pobox.com
Delivery-Date: Fri Sep 6 23:39:48 2002
From: skip@pobox.com (Skip Montanaro)
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 17:39:48 -0500
Subject: [Spambayes] understanding high false negative rate
In-Reply-To: <LNBBLJKPBEHFEDALKOLCIEJKBCAB.tim.one@comcast.net>
References: <15737.2576.315460.956295@slothrop.zope.com>
<LNBBLJKPBEHFEDALKOLCIEJKBCAB.tim.one@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <15737.11956.18745.619040@12-248-11-90.client.attbi.com>
>> > ##Remove: jeremy@alum.mit.edu##
Tim> Yuck: it got two 0.01's from embedding your email address at the
Tim> bottom here.
Which suggests that tagging email addresses in To/CC headers should be
handled differently than in message bodies?
Skip