51 lines
2.3 KiB
Plaintext
51 lines
2.3 KiB
Plaintext
From schaefer@zanshin.com Mon Sep 16 19:20:19 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <schaefer@zanshin.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org
|
|
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CDDD16F16
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 19:20:19 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 16 Sep 2002 19:20:19 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from moonbase.zanshin.com (IDENT:root@moonbase.zanshin.com
|
|
[167.160.213.139]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
|
|
g8GIJ2C04846 for <jm@jmason.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 19:19:02 +0100
|
|
Received: from aztec.zanshin.com (IDENT:schaefer@aztec.zanshin.com
|
|
[167.160.213.132]) by moonbase.zanshin.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
|
|
g8GIJJh32385; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 11:19:19 -0700
|
|
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 11:19:19 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@zanshin.com>
|
|
To: Justin Mason <yyyy@spamassassin.taint.org>
|
|
Cc: Simon Matthews <simon@paxonet.com>,
|
|
<spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Can someone please tell me how to get an answer from
|
|
this list?
|
|
In-Reply-To: <20020916180348.DBE0616F03@spamassassin.taint.org>
|
|
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209161114300.17242-100000@aztec.zanshin.com>
|
|
Mail-Followup-To: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
|
|
|
|
On Mon, 16 Sep 2002, Justin Mason wrote:
|
|
|
|
> Simon Matthews said:
|
|
>
|
|
> > Procmail 3.21 is reliable as long as none of the recipies fails. I was
|
|
> > hoping to resolve the triplets.txt problem and thus avoid the procmail
|
|
> > "^rom" problem.
|
|
>
|
|
> I doubt it's related, actually -- the "triplets" stuff is in a totally
|
|
> unrelated area of code.
|
|
|
|
The procmail bug happens when the filter program does something that
|
|
procmail doesn't expect. Exactly what that something is, hasn't been
|
|
confirmed by anyone on the procmail list. It might be exiting with a
|
|
nonzero status, or it might be producing output on the standard error,
|
|
or it might be something else entirely.
|
|
|
|
So Simon is attempting to get SA to run flawlessly, because then it can't
|
|
tickle the procmail bug. This isn't a fix, it's a band-aid, but because
|
|
he apparently doesn't have the option of installing a newer procmail ...
|
|
|
|
|