49 lines
1.9 KiB
Plaintext
49 lines
1.9 KiB
Plaintext
From quinlan@pathname.com Mon Sep 16 10:41:51 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <quinlan@pathname.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org
|
|
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9220716F03
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 10:41:50 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 16 Sep 2002 10:41:50 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from proton.pathname.com
|
|
(adsl-216-103-211-240.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.103.211.240]) by
|
|
dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8G4tNC13670 for
|
|
<jm@jmason.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 05:55:23 +0100
|
|
Received: from quinlan by proton.pathname.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1
|
|
(Debian)) id 17qnvH-0004Rr-00; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 21:55:47 -0700
|
|
From: Daniel Quinlan <quinlan@pathname.com>
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
|
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|
|
Message-Id: <15749.25683.361874.673913@proton.pathname.com>
|
|
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 21:55:47 -0700
|
|
To: yyyy@spamassassin.taint.org (Justin Mason)
|
|
Cc: Daniel Quinlan <quinlan@pathname.com>,
|
|
Matt Sergeant <msergeant@startechgroup.co.uk>,
|
|
Spamassassin-devel <spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Subject: Re: [SAdev] testing with less rules
|
|
In-Reply-To: <20020915233332.82A4E16F03@spamassassin.taint.org>
|
|
References: <quinlan@pathname.com> <yf2k7los0z5.fsf@proton.pathname.com>
|
|
<20020915233332.82A4E16F03@jmason.org>
|
|
X-Mailer: VM 7.04 under Emacs 20.7.2
|
|
Reply-To: quinlan@pathname.com
|
|
|
|
Justin Mason <jm@jmason.org> writes:
|
|
|
|
> hmm. also I think I've found some cases where it's hitting on fetchmail
|
|
> Received hdrs. that's bad. so it could be fixed....
|
|
|
|
fetchmail adds Received headers? That seems wrong. I'll open a bug
|
|
to investigate. Can you attach some examples?
|
|
|
|
> yeah, will do -- somehow. pity the bugzilla doesn't allow email
|
|
> submissions...
|
|
|
|
Agreed. At least you can add information with email.
|
|
|
|
- Dan
|
|
|
|
|