106 lines
4.6 KiB
Plaintext
106 lines
4.6 KiB
Plaintext
From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Thu Aug 29 17:35:05 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
|
|
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15AE143F99
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:35:04 -0400 (EDT)
|
|
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:35:04 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
|
|
[216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
|
|
g7TGYiZ20463 for <jm-sa@jmason.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:34:44 +0100
|
|
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
|
|
helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
|
|
esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17kSF9-0001Qi-00; Thu,
|
|
29 Aug 2002 09:34:03 -0700
|
|
Received: from joseki.proulx.com ([216.17.153.58]) by
|
|
usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id
|
|
17kSED-000405-00 for <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>;
|
|
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 09:33:05 -0700
|
|
Received: from misery.proulx.com (misery.proulx.com [192.168.1.108]) by
|
|
joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86DF514B33 for
|
|
<spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:32:57 -0600
|
|
(MDT)
|
|
Received: by misery.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 72129A8369;
|
|
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:32:57 -0600 (MDT)
|
|
To: Spamassassin-Talk <spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] O.T. Habeus -- Why?
|
|
Message-Id: <20020829163257.GD10973@misery.proulx.com>
|
|
Mail-Followup-To: Spamassassin-Talk <spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>
|
|
References: <schaefer@zanshin.com>
|
|
<Pine.LNX.4.44.0208290714450.30051-100000@aztec.zanshin.com>
|
|
<20020829160017.9E3C643F99@phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com>
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
|
|
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
|
|
boundary="9amGYk9869ThD9tj"
|
|
Content-Disposition: inline
|
|
In-Reply-To: <20020829160017.9E3C643F99@phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com>
|
|
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
|
|
From: bob@proulx.com (Bob Proulx)
|
|
Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
|
|
Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
|
|
X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net
|
|
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
|
|
Precedence: bulk
|
|
List-Help: <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@example.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
|
|
List-Post: <mailto:spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>
|
|
List-Subscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
|
|
<mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
|
|
List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin <spamassassin-talk.example.sourceforge.net>
|
|
List-Unsubscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
|
|
<mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
|
|
List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=spamassassin-talk>
|
|
X-Original-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:32:57 -0600
|
|
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:32:57 -0600
|
|
|
|
|
|
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
|
|
Content-Disposition: inline
|
|
|
|
Justin Mason <jm@jmason.org> [2002-08-29 17:00:12 +0100]:
|
|
> Well, my point is more that we should aim our rescoring algorithm so that
|
|
> a spam hits 5.0. Any higher does us no good, as it means an FP is
|
|
> a lot harder to recover from, using compensation rules.
|
|
|
|
Agreed.
|
|
|
|
But I have always thought that the value 5 was not the best value. It
|
|
should have been 0. I understand that initially only spammy scores
|
|
were included. But I believe the algorithm should be purely
|
|
symmetrical and non-spammy negative values should also have been
|
|
balancing out the spammy positive values, like they do in SA today.
|
|
Then anything that was positive would be spam and anything negative
|
|
would be non-spam. (And I guess exactly zero is grey. :-) Today's
|
|
choice of 5 just adds an offset. Which I think cause people to assume
|
|
things work differently than they do.
|
|
|
|
Bob
|
|
|
|
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj
|
|
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
|
|
Content-Disposition: inline
|
|
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
|
|
|
|
iD8DBQE9bky50pRcO8E2ULYRAjI6AJwMoi8s2IUg4XpVAwCqpBC3gcd/cQCfepOm
|
|
COS03YufMiFLSHhCZ8KkLxU=
|
|
=YwM7
|
|
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|
|
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj--
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------
|
|
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
|
|
Welcome to geek heaven.
|
|
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
|
|
_______________________________________________
|
|
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
|
|
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
|
|
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
|
|
|