91 lines
4.5 KiB
Plaintext
91 lines
4.5 KiB
Plaintext
From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Thu Aug 29 11:08:40 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
|
|
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C1647C76
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 06:06:17 -0400 (EDT)
|
|
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:06:17 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
|
|
[216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
|
|
g7T5lcZ00342 for <jm-sa@jmason.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 06:47:38 +0100
|
|
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
|
|
helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
|
|
esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17kI82-0001mr-00; Wed,
|
|
28 Aug 2002 22:46:02 -0700
|
|
Received: from 12-248-14-26.client.attbi.com ([12.248.14.26]
|
|
helo=12-248-11-90.client.attbi.com) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with
|
|
esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id
|
|
17kI75-00013x-00 for <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>;
|
|
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 22:45:03 -0700
|
|
Received: (from skip@localhost) by 12-248-11-90.client.attbi.com
|
|
(8.11.6/8.11.6) id g7T5isf30319; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 00:44:54 -0500
|
|
From: Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com>
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
|
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|
|
Message-Id: <15725.46293.831269.315365@12-248-11-90.client.attbi.com>
|
|
To: Daniel Quinlan <quinlan@pathname.com>
|
|
Cc: "Dan Kohn" <dan@dankohn.com>,
|
|
<spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] O.T. Habeus -- Why?
|
|
In-Reply-To: <yf2k7majkol.fsf@proton.pathname.com>
|
|
References: <A23DE7A325D23B49A76B54080E0BCB9E2924A9@kabul.ad.skymv.com>
|
|
<yf2k7majkol.fsf@proton.pathname.com>
|
|
X-Mailer: VM 6.96 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
|
|
Reply-To: skip@pobox.com
|
|
Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
|
|
Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
|
|
X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net
|
|
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
|
|
Precedence: bulk
|
|
List-Help: <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@example.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
|
|
List-Post: <mailto:spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>
|
|
List-Subscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
|
|
<mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
|
|
List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin <spamassassin-talk.example.sourceforge.net>
|
|
List-Unsubscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
|
|
<mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
|
|
List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=spamassassin-talk>
|
|
X-Original-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 00:44:53 -0500
|
|
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 00:44:53 -0500
|
|
|
|
|
|
DanQ> I think it would make more sense to start Habeas with a less
|
|
DanQ> aggressive score (one which will not give spammers a quick path
|
|
DanQ> into everyone's inbox) and after we've seen evidence that the
|
|
DanQ> system works, then we can increase the magnitude of the score.
|
|
|
|
Better yet, let the GA figure out the correct score. ;-) That will obviously
|
|
take awhile since you'll have to acquire enough messages with it, but it
|
|
should give you a good idea if the presence of Habeus headers are good spam
|
|
indicators or not. If they are, my guess is that Habeus will probably not
|
|
succeed.
|
|
|
|
Taking things further off-topic: Does Habeus charge a license fee to
|
|
organizations who want to use their copyrighted material or is their sole
|
|
revenue stream to come from legal judgements? On the one hand, if they
|
|
charge license fees, I'd worry that when times got tough they'd be somewhat
|
|
less critical of organizations we'd call spammers today in order to generate
|
|
license fees. If not, I'd worry the pendulum would swing the other way and
|
|
they'd go after legitimate businesses in an attempt to generate more
|
|
revenues from judgements and/or out of court settlements. Either way, it
|
|
seems like they have an interesting tightrope to walk.
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Skip Montanaro
|
|
skip@pobox.com
|
|
consulting: http://manatee.mojam.com/~skip/resume.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------
|
|
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
|
|
Welcome to geek heaven.
|
|
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
|
|
_______________________________________________
|
|
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
|
|
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
|
|
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
|
|
|