142 lines
5.1 KiB
Plaintext
142 lines
5.1 KiB
Plaintext
From fork-admin@xent.com Tue Sep 17 11:29:48 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org
|
|
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657D616F03
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:29:47 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:29:47 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
|
|
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8GJJZC06421 for <jm@jmason.org>;
|
|
Mon, 16 Sep 2002 20:19:36 +0100
|
|
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
|
|
with ESMTP id 97E102940CF; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 12:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Delivered-To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
|
|
Received: from mail.evergo.net (unknown [206.191.151.2]) by xent.com
|
|
(Postfix) with SMTP id BEBD02940CD for <fork@xent.com>; Mon,
|
|
16 Sep 2002 12:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Received: (qmail 30648 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2002 19:19:01 -0000
|
|
Received: from dsl.206.191.151.102.evergo.net (HELO JMHALL)
|
|
(206.191.151.102) by mail.evergo.net with SMTP; 16 Sep 2002 19:19:01 -0000
|
|
Reply-To: <johnhall@evergo.net>
|
|
From: "John Hall" <johnhall@evergo.net>
|
|
To: "'Stephen D. Williams'" <sdw@lig.net>
|
|
Cc: <fork@spamassassin.taint.org>, <lea@lig.net>
|
|
Subject: RE: Slaughter in the Name of God
|
|
Message-Id: <003701c25db5$e9d7e860$0200a8c0@JMHALL>
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
|
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|
|
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
|
|
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
|
|
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
|
|
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
|
|
Importance: Normal
|
|
In-Reply-To: <3D8628B3.1020906@hpti.com>
|
|
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
X-Beenthere: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
|
|
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
|
|
Precedence: bulk
|
|
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
|
|
List-Post: <mailto:fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
|
|
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
|
|
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
|
|
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
|
|
<mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
|
|
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
|
|
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 12:18:59 -0700
|
|
|
|
First, it was my understanding that they had the food before they
|
|
refused to pay. I often have the goods in my possession before I settle
|
|
the paycheck.
|
|
|
|
Second, 'not being paid for a little food' is an awfully big deal in
|
|
India. It isn't far from stealing the only food my children have so
|
|
I'll have to watch them starve. The margin of survival is very, very,
|
|
thin.
|
|
|
|
So yes. In my particular reality distortion field 'not paying for a
|
|
little food' in India is akin to a direct act of violence intended to
|
|
cause suffering if not death on the victims family. That such an act
|
|
triggers a violent response is, IMHO, hardly surprising.
|
|
|
|
In other words, as far as I could tell the people on the train fired the
|
|
first shot.
|
|
|
|
With all of that said I still don't know if this happened or not. Nor
|
|
do I know for sure that the margin of survival for those Muslim vendors
|
|
was that thin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
> -----Original Message-----
|
|
> From: Stephen D. Williams [mailto:swilliams@hpti.com]
|
|
> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 11:54 AM
|
|
> To: johnhall@evergo.net
|
|
> Cc: fork@spamassassin.taint.org; lea@lig.net
|
|
> Subject: Re: Slaughter in the Name of God
|
|
>
|
|
> Wow! It seems you are evaluating this with a large reality distortion
|
|
> field.
|
|
>
|
|
> If the activists on the train refused to pay for food, then the
|
|
vendors
|
|
> shouldn't give it to them. And the local police force should be
|
|
> arresting them. Etc.
|
|
>
|
|
> You have to be operating from a particularly primitive point of view,
|
|
> which obviously was in operation with the participants here, to think
|
|
> that religious differences or not being paid for a little food (or
|
|
> taunting!) was even a remote justification for burning a train full of
|
|
> people alive.
|
|
>
|
|
> sdw
|
|
>
|
|
> John Hall wrote:
|
|
> > What I understood was that the activists on the train refused to pay
|
|
for
|
|
> > the food and other items they acquired from the Muslim vendors --
|
|
then
|
|
> > taunted them.
|
|
> >
|
|
> > That may not be true, but it would put things in a more interesting
|
|
> > light. Taking food from a small vendor in India and not paying them
|
|
is
|
|
> > trying to starve them.
|
|
> >
|
|
> > It sounded consistent with the ideas and purpose of the train full
|
|
of
|
|
> > activists.
|
|
> >
|
|
> > I'm rarely an apologist for Muslims anywhere. Yet I find my
|
|
sympathies
|
|
> > with the Muslims in this case, even after they burned the train.
|
|
> >
|
|
> >
|
|
> >
|
|
> >>From: fork-admin@xent.com [mailto:fork-admin@xent.com] On Behalf Of
|
|
> >>Stephen D. Williams
|
|
> >
|
|
> >
|
|
> >>The pity of it is that some
|
|
> >>Muslims were ready to give it to them. Their murderous attack on the
|
|
> >>train-load of VHP activists at Godhra (with its awful, atavistic
|
|
> >
|
|
> > echoes
|
|
> >
|
|
> >>of the killings of Hindus and Muslims by the train-load during the
|
|
> >>partition riots of 1947) played right into the Hindu extremists'
|
|
> >
|
|
> > hands.
|
|
>
|
|
> sdw
|
|
> --
|
|
> swilliams@hpti.com http://www.hpti.com
|
|
> Stephen D. Williams, Senior Technical Director
|
|
>
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|