64 lines
3.0 KiB
Plaintext
64 lines
3.0 KiB
Plaintext
From fork-admin@xent.com Fri Sep 13 13:37:25 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org
|
|
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B297916F03
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:37:24 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:37:24 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
|
|
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8CKYhC14626 for <jm@jmason.org>;
|
|
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 21:34:46 +0100
|
|
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
|
|
with ESMTP id 0D3A82940E5; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 13:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Delivered-To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
|
|
Received: from Boron.MeepZor.Com (i.meepzor.com [204.146.167.214]) by
|
|
xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38FF29409A for <fork@xent.com>;
|
|
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 13:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Received: from sashimi (dmz-firewall [206.199.198.4]) by Boron.MeepZor.Com
|
|
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8CKXVO32620 for <fork@xent.com>;
|
|
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 16:33:31 -0400
|
|
From: "Bill Stoddard" <bill@wstoddard.com>
|
|
To: "Fork@Xent.Com" <fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
|
|
Subject: RE: dylsexics of the wrold, untie!
|
|
Message-Id: <JHEPKCEMGPKFFDHHDDKDAEIOFFAA.bill@wstoddard.com>
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
|
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|
|
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
|
|
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
|
|
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
|
|
In-Reply-To: <1031860743.14237.42.camel@avalon>
|
|
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
|
|
Importance: Normal
|
|
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
X-Beenthere: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
|
|
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
|
|
Precedence: bulk
|
|
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
|
|
List-Post: <mailto:fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
|
|
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
|
|
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
|
|
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
|
|
<mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
|
|
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
|
|
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 16:32:52 -0400
|
|
|
|
> If the text recognition algorithm/architecture humans use is anything
|
|
> like the algorithm/structure we've been working with, the reason the
|
|
> first letter (and to a lesser extent, the last letter) is important is
|
|
> that without it the text pattern recognition problem is exponentially
|
|
> more difficult (from a theoretical standpoint anyway) and has to be
|
|
> resolved using deeper abstraction analysis. The middle letters are far
|
|
> less important and computationally much easier to resolve correctly.
|
|
|
|
I think keeping the number of middle letters consistent with the correct
|
|
spelling is important. Would be interesting to see if this same effect is
|
|
applicable to written forms of other languages, maybe even Japanese romongi.
|
|
|
|
Bill
|
|
|
|
|