105 lines
4.3 KiB
Plaintext
105 lines
4.3 KiB
Plaintext
From fork-admin@xent.com Mon Sep 9 19:27:24 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org
|
|
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77F816EFC
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 19:27:23 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 09 Sep 2002 19:27:23 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
|
|
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g89DgDC16853 for <jm@jmason.org>;
|
|
Mon, 9 Sep 2002 14:42:14 +0100
|
|
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
|
|
with ESMTP id 348A82942DA; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 06:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Delivered-To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
|
|
Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38])
|
|
by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3402942D9 for <fork@xent.com>;
|
|
Mon, 9 Sep 2002 06:38:26 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Received: from h00e098788e1f.ne.client2.attbi.com ([24.61.143.15]) by
|
|
rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626)
|
|
with ESMTP id
|
|
<20020909134114.LFBW19682.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@h00e098788e1f.ne.client2.attbi.com>;
|
|
Mon, 9 Sep 2002 13:41:14 +0000
|
|
From: bitbitch@magnesium.net
|
|
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Educational
|
|
Reply-To: bitbitch@magnesium.net
|
|
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
|
|
Message-Id: <10770315074.20020909094137@magnesium.net>
|
|
To: Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org>
|
|
Cc: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
|
|
Subject: Re[2]: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...)
|
|
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209091305070.32400-100000@hydrogen.leitl.org>
|
|
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209091305070.32400-100000@hydrogen.leitl.org>
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
|
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|
|
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
X-Beenthere: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
|
|
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
|
|
Precedence: bulk
|
|
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
|
|
List-Post: <mailto:fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
|
|
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
|
|
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
|
|
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
|
|
<mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
|
|
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
|
|
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 09:41:37 -0400
|
|
|
|
|
|
EL> On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, CDale wrote:
|
|
|
|
>> I agree w/ ya Tom. That kind of thinking is SO idiotic. Sure, gays
|
|
|
|
EL> So how many of your hetero friends had >3 k lovers?
|
|
|
|
So Eugen, how many of your homo friends have -had- 3k lovers?
|
|
|
|
In fact, thats a general question for FoRK proper.
|
|
|
|
Do you know anyone, outside of meybee Wilt Chamberlin and a few of the
|
|
gang-bang porn queens who -have- had even 1.5k lovers?
|
|
|
|
Eegads, if you're hypothesizing numbers like -that- Eugen, you at
|
|
least owe it to FoRK to back that shit up.
|
|
|
|
Otherwise we're liable to assume rampant unfounded homophobia and that
|
|
would just be a lose.
|
|
|
|
Just a quick assumption here. I'm not a math geek or anything, but
|
|
assuming 1 lover every day, that would be like at least one lover
|
|
everyday for 8 years and some change. I don't know about you, but
|
|
very very few of us are -that- lucky (or even close to that lucky)
|
|
and after awhile, even the sexaholics get bored and have to mingle
|
|
something new into their weekends. You really are assumiing that the
|
|
homosexual population is a) that large in a given area (The meccas
|
|
might qualify, but try finding that kind of homosexual population in
|
|
say, Tulsa, Oklahoma or Manchester, NH (Tho Manchester does have quite
|
|
a few nifty gaybars, but thats a different story) b) that bored/sex
|
|
obsessed/recreationally free to pursue sex that often, with that many
|
|
partners or that they'd even WANT that many partners.
|
|
|
|
Qualify yourself, or at least lower your outrageous numbers.
|
|
|
|
=BB
|
|
>> are promiscuous, and so are hets, but I betcha gays are more
|
|
>> AIDSphobic than hets, generally speaking....
|
|
|
|
EL> The virus load issue is orthogonal to the fact. Bzzt. Switch on your
|
|
EL> brain, you both. I was mentioning that a subpopulation outside of the sex
|
|
EL> industry is/used to be extremely promiscuous, about two orders of
|
|
EL> magnitude higher than average.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Best regards,
|
|
bitbitch mailto:bitbitch@magnesium.net
|
|
|
|
|