66 lines
3.0 KiB
Plaintext
66 lines
3.0 KiB
Plaintext
From fork-admin@xent.com Tue Sep 3 14:24:06 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org
|
|
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5FEA16F3A
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 14:22:41 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 03 Sep 2002 14:22:41 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
|
|
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g82NOvZ25819 for <jm@jmason.org>;
|
|
Tue, 3 Sep 2002 00:24:57 +0100
|
|
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
|
|
with ESMTP id C612C2940ED; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 16:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Delivered-To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
|
|
Received: from mithral.com (watcher.mithral.com [204.153.244.1]) by
|
|
xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E7D342940AC for <fork@xent.com>;
|
|
Mon, 2 Sep 2002 16:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Received: (qmail 7871 invoked by uid 1111); 2 Sep 2002 23:24:05 -0000
|
|
From: "Adam L. Beberg" <beberg@mithral.com>
|
|
To: "Reza B'Far (eBuilt)" <rbfar@ebuilt.com>
|
|
Cc: <fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
|
|
Subject: RE: Java is for kiddies
|
|
In-Reply-To: <NCBBJMBPOKEEKDAILFNGOEBKFEAA.rbfar@ebuilt.com>
|
|
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209021619291.7820-100000@watcher.mithral.com>
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
|
|
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
X-Beenthere: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
|
|
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
|
|
Precedence: bulk
|
|
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
|
|
List-Post: <mailto:fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
|
|
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
|
|
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
|
|
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
|
|
<mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
|
|
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
|
|
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 16:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
|
|
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Reza B'Far (eBuilt) wrote:
|
|
|
|
> With the increasing prevalence of web services (not that they are always a
|
|
> good thing), I doubt that parsing XML will be something that will remain at
|
|
> the Java application layer for long... Recent threads here on Fork
|
|
> indicating the move towards hardware parsing or this code even become part
|
|
> of the native implementation of Java on various platforms...
|
|
|
|
OK, so, you get the XML toss it through hardware and turn it back into a
|
|
struct/object whatever you call your binary data. I agree this is the way
|
|
things will go, as XML parsing has just too much overhead to survive in the
|
|
application layer. So why turn it into XML in the first place? Becasue it
|
|
gives geeks something to do and sells XML hardware accelerators and way more
|
|
CPUs?
|
|
|
|
Is there anyone out there actually doing anything new that actually IMPROVES
|
|
things anymore, or are they all too scared of the fact that improvements put
|
|
people out of work and cut #1 is the creators...
|
|
|
|
- Adam L. "Duncan" Beberg
|
|
http://www.mithral.com/~beberg/
|
|
beberg@mithral.com
|
|
|
|
|