GeronBook/Ch3/datasets/spam/easy_ham/00291.69656be850c89e739f4ae...

84 lines
3.9 KiB
Plaintext

From rpm-list-admin@freshrpms.net Wed Oct 9 10:53:15 2002
Return-Path: <rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net>
Delivered-To: zzzz@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
by spamassassin.taint.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7447D16F7F
for <zzzz@localhost>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:52:16 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for zzzz@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 09 Oct 2002 10:52:16 +0100 (IST)
Received: from egwn.net (auth02.nl.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by
dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9999BK27619 for
<zzzz-rpm@spamassassin.taint.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:09:11 +0100
Received: from auth02.nl.egwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by egwn.net
(8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g99941f25722; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:04:01
+0200
Received: from python (gw01.es3.egwn.net [212.9.66.13]) (authenticated) by
egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g9993Df23422 for
<rpm-list@freshrpms.net>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:03:13 +0200
From: Matthias Saou <matthias@rpmforge.net>
To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
Subject: Re: Apt repository authentication: it's time
Message-Id: <20021009110311.32c22ea5.matthias@rpmforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <20021008175452.581c0e50.kilroy@kamakiriad.com>
References: <20021008175452.581c0e50.kilroy@kamakiriad.com>
Organization: freshrpms.net / rpmforge.net
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.3claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux)
X-Operating-System: Red Hat GNU/Linux forever!
X-Subliminal-Message: Use Linux... use Linux... use Linux...
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailscanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
Sender: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net
Errors-To: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net
X-Beenthere: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
List-Help: <mailto:rpm-zzzlist-request@freshrpms.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-zzzlist>,
<mailto:rpm-list-request@freshrpms.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Freshrpms RPM discussion list <rpm-zzzlist.freshrpms.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-zzzlist>,
<mailto:rpm-list-request@freshrpms.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/rpm-zzzlist/>
X-Original-Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:03:11 +0200
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:03:11 +0200
Once upon a time, Brian wrote :
> OK, it's now time to work out the PGP securing of apt repository
> traffic. I've never gotten anything but "sitename.whatever will not
> be authenticated" until running Redhat 8.0 when I get something
> about having "No Key" for various files.
I don't think gpg signing my repositories will help anything, as it will
just ensure that my passphrase was typed to confirm the md5 signatures of
all pgklists and srclists. Basically, you'll then just be sure that it's me
who generated the files, and this will of course prevent automating the
process of updating the apt repository when Red Hat updates show up.
In Red Hat Linux 8.0 though, the warnings about "No Key" appear until you
import the right gpg public keys directly with rpm, for example :
rpm --import /usr/share/doc/apt-0.5.4cnc7/RPM-GPG-KEY
(this will import my key, which is used to sign all freshrpms.net packages)
Hopefully it is possible to the tell rpm to install *only* packages who
verify against an imported gpg key? This for me would be the optimal way to
ensure integrity with the way things curently work.
Matthias
--
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Red Hat Linux release 7.3 (Valhalla) running Linux kernel 2.4.18-10acpi
Load : 0.14 0.18 0.17
_______________________________________________
RPM-List mailing list <RPM-List@freshrpms.net>
http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list