GeronBook/Ch3/datasets/spam/easy_ham/01489.408e736d2c2fb22b64f9b...

56 lines
2.3 KiB
Plaintext

From jm@jmason.org Wed Sep 18 12:45:20 2002
Return-Path: <yyyy@spamassassin.taint.org>
Delivered-To: yyyy@spamassassin.taint.org
Received: by spamassassin.taint.org (Postfix, from userid 500)
id 9B11716F1A; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 12:45:20 +0100 (IST)
Received: from spamassassin.taint.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 8EBC1F7B1; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 12:45:20 +0100 (IST)
To: "Gary Funck" <gary@Intrepid.Com>
Cc: "Spamassassin List" <spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>,
"Justin Mason" <jm@jmason.org>
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] checking out Razor2 (and SA 2.41) install - Net::DNS:Resolver problem?
In-Reply-To: Message from "Gary Funck" <gary@Intrepid.Com>
of "Tue, 17 Sep 2002 18:36:05 PDT." <KNEFLOIOCHLFEGCDNFPHKEHPCFAA.gary@intrepid.com>
From: yyyy@spamassassin.taint.org (Justin Mason)
X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: 0A48 2D8B 0B52 A87D 0E8A 6ADD 4137 1B50 6E58 EF0A
X-Habeas-Swe-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-Swe-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-Swe-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-Swe-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-Swe-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-Swe-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-Swe-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-Swe-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-Swe-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 12:45:15 +0100
Sender: yyyy@spamassassin.taint.org
Message-Id: <20020918114520.9B11716F1A@spamassassin.taint.org>
Gary Funck said:
> I thought the ">> /perllocal.pod" line looked odd. Is it normal to write
> documentation into the root directory? (<g>). Is there some Make parameter, o
> r
> environment variable that should've been set when I ran "make"?
an issue for Razor folks I think.
> It seems that by registering that I avoided the error path noted in my previo
> us
> e-mail where DNS::Net::Resolver was called, but does not exist in my Perl
> hierarchy. Here's the new output from SA ans Razor2:
looks good.
> Question: if we use spamassassin on a per-user basis, invoked from procmailrc
> ,
> will each user have to run "razor-admin -register" first? Is there way to
> register with Razor just once per system?
If you use spamd with the -H option and provide a shared directory for
the razor config files to be written to. RTFM for more details...
--j.