From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Fri Sep 13 20:45:39 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D4E16F03 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 20:45:37 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 13 Sep 2002 20:45:37 +0100 (IST) Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8DJZZC32227 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 20:35:35 +0100 Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13] helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17pw9f-0005dL-00; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 12:31:03 -0700 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.spamassassin.taint.org ([66.187.233.200] helo=lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17pw8x-000458-00 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 12:30:19 -0700 Received: from [10.0.0.221] (vpn50-6.rdu.spamassassin.taint.org [172.16.50.6]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g8DJU6826890; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:30:06 -0400 Subject: Re: [SAtalk] OT: DNS MX Record Clarification Please From: Jason Kohles To: vernon@comp-wiz.com Cc: spamassassin-talk In-Reply-To: <20020913183343.M49078@b2unow.com> References: <20020913151635.M21128@b2unow.com> <20020913183343.M49078@b2unow.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Message-Id: <1031945265.2215.2.camel@traveller> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Original-Date: 13 Sep 2002 15:27:38 -0400 Date: 13 Sep 2002 15:27:38 -0400 On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 14:33, vernon wrote: > > But only some of the mail is actually being scanned which leads me to > believe that not all of the mail is actually hitting that box and the 10 > never goes down. Why? Have I got something confused here? > Sending mail directly to a backup mail server in the hopes that it has less stringent spam scanning is a common spammer trick. -- Jason Kohles jkohles@redhat.com Senior Engineer Red Hat Professional Consulting ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk