From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Mon Aug 26 16:57:12 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5CBF44157 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 11:57:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:57:05 +0100 (IST) Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7QFoqZ31545 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:50:52 +0100 Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13] helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17jM70-0006iM-00; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:49:06 -0700 Received: from [212.2.188.179] (helo=mandark.labs.netnoteinc.com) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17jM6V-0003PE-00 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:48:36 -0700 Received: from phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com [192.168.2.14]) by mandark.labs.netnoteinc.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7QFmQ500742; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:48:26 +0100 Received: by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 542CD43F99; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 11:46:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phobos (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C96933D8B; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:46:26 +0100 (IST) To: "Craig R.Hughes" Cc: Bart Schaefer , spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [SAtalk] 2.40 RELEASE: oops -- newer freqs. In-Reply-To: Message from "Craig R.Hughes" of "Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:31:03 PDT." From: yyyy@spamassassin.taint.org (Justin Mason) X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: 0A48 2D8B 0B52 A87D 0E8A 6ADD 4137 1B50 6E58 EF0A X-Habeas-Swe-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-Swe-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-Swe-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-Swe-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-Swe-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-Swe-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-Swe-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-Swe-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-Swe-9: mark in spam to . Message-Id: <20020826154626.542CD43F99@phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com> Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Original-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:46:21 +0100 Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:46:21 +0100 "Craig R.Hughes" said: > The GA run on the current corpus is yielding an average (mean) > score for false-positives of about 10 points, which is higher > than before. There's some tweaking to be done yet (rule > elimination and such), so that will likely fall, but -15 might > not be enough of a correction in many situations. I will set > the scores for the Habeas stuff and the Ironport stuff to be > sensible given: > > a) estimated likeliness of compliance with Habeas/Bonded sender > rules, and > b) score correction level needed to achieve purposes of those projects. Using the score-ranges stuff and my aggressive anti-FP evaluation code, BTW, yielded an average FP of 5.7 points, with 0.67% FPs and 96.57% overall accuracy -- but I notice you went back to the other method. Just pointing this out ;) --j. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk