From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Mon Aug 26 16:57:11 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B491743F99 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 11:57:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:57:04 +0100 (IST) Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7QFopZ31540 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:50:51 +0100 Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13] helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17jM71-0006j9-00; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:49:07 -0700 Received: from adsl-209-204-188-196.sonic.net ([209.204.188.196] helo=sidebone.sidney.com) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17jM6Y-0003PI-00 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:48:38 -0700 Received: from siddhi (siddhi.sidney.com [192.168.93.20]) by sidebone.sidney.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g7QFmVCp013874 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:48:31 -0700 Message-Id: <009901c24d18$0777a2b0$145da8c0@sidney.com> From: "Sidney Markowitz" To: References: Subject: Re: [SAtalk] 2.40 RELEASE: oops -- newer freqs. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Scanned-BY: MIMEDefang 2.19 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Original-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:48:31 -0700 Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:48:31 -0700 Daniel Quinlan wrote: > Exactly, except that I think you may be too optimistic > about the reporting, the timeframe, and the accuracy. That's another argument for a "HLL" (Habeas Licensee List) which would be less inclusive than a test for the mark of for HIL, but more timely and accurate. When an ip address is on the HLL it could get a huge negative score, bigger than the Habeas mark alone. -- sidney ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk